FAQ

Q: why not organize and stop treating the bus as a legitimate entity? why aren’t you working to stop the bus?

A: do both. cut the fuel line. break windows. put oatmeal in the gas tank. but maybe your efforts don’t succeed this election cycle. and if so don’t fucking throw away your vote if it can help your neighbors fucking survive. “harm reduction” is not a political strategy for action. it is a last minute, end of the line decision to save lives, after all other resources have been exhausted.

    • zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      6·
      8 个月前

      I’m doing the moral calculations. Fuck Biden, but fuck Trump more. If I vote for Biden, millions suffer. If I vote for Trump (or waste my vote so he wins), even more suffer. Doesn’t take too much evaluating to pick being slapped in the face vs bring punched in the face.

      I absolutely support the undecided campaign in the primaries to put pressure on Biden, but putting pressure on him and the DNC by letting Trump be in charge for another 4 years is a terrible idea. Even without Trump in office the GOP is quickly eroding even the semblance of democracy we’ve had for a while, but with 4 years of Trump accelerating that I think this would be the last time my vote even slightly matters. Then I’d also need to evacuate from the country because I’m trans and don’t want them ruining my life. I’m voting for Biden in the general to avoid that, and then afterwards I guess I have to figure out what I can even do about the still-evolving bad situation that I helped successfully slow.

      If reducing suffering and not letting an impossible perfect be the enemy of the better is amoral, I don’t understand your definition of moral. I’m a utilitarian if you couldn’t tell.

      • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
        3·
        8 个月前

        > I’m a utilitarian if you couldn’t tell.

        oh my. how do you deal with the fact that the future is unknowable, so the morality of all actions is also unknowable?

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            4·
            8 个月前

            to be clear, you acknowledge that you can’t know which actions are moral under your system, but you still rely on it to make moral actions?

            • zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              2·
              8 个月前

              There’s always uncertainty, yes. I suppose other moral systems claim they’re infallible but those people are just kidding themselves.

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                5·
                8 个月前

                a deontological system places the morality in the action itself, so you know before you do it whether its the right thing to do. ontological systems change the morality of the action depending on the results in the future.

                what if we need trump to be elected in order to escape earth before the sun goes nova? it’s an unknowable proposition, but are you willing to risk all of humanity on voting for biden?

                • zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  2·
                  8 个月前

                  If you can convince me voting for Trump will give greater expected value then I’ll do it, but such absurd possibilities like you said usually come with an exact inverse that cancels out its expected value.

                  Should I let that butterfly flap its wings? What if it causes a tornado somewhere?! Or, what if it not flapping causes a tornado somewhere?! Both are equally plausible, so there’s no point in choosing my actions based on them.

                  • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                    3·
                    8 个月前

                    I think you understand the problem of the unknowableness of the effects of our actions, and subsequently how absurd it is to use that as a basis of our morality.

                    I’m not trying to get you to vote for trump, I’m trying to get you to choose a useful moral framework.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          4·
          8 个月前

          They said they aren’t voting for Biden, and in a FPTP system that’s what it means.

            • Syrc@lemmy.world
              1·
              8 个月前

              And because of how FPTP works, they unfortunately translate to “Trump”, “Biden”, “Whatever” and “I don’t care”.

              • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
                1·
                8 个月前

                You’re not getting it, it doesn’t matter who wins the next election because Trump and Biden are so very similar. So many of the things people are saying Trump will do is already happening under the Biden administration. If the Democrats saw that they lost the election bc 10-20% of voters issued a protest or third party vote, which actually happened during the primaries, it would make a huge impact.

                • Syrc@lemmy.world
                  1·
                  8 个月前

                  So many of the things people are saying Trump will do is already happening under the Biden administration.

                  …because of officials elected by Trump.

                  There’s a crapload of policies others already pointed out that make Biden extremely different from Trump, if you still think they’re “very similar” you’re just being willfully ignorant at this point.

                  • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    8 个月前

                    Biden is definitely more palatable, but at the end of the day, either way we will have a president happy to fund genocide. Either way we waste billions on military, have a huge incarcerated prison population, deport immigrants, could go on. Biden was vice president during Obama’s drone strikes.