• Eggyhead@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    A lot of people in this thread have a lot of really strong opinions without actually reading the article. The model was cool with it, but she herself also thinks it’s time to retire the photo from how it’s being used in image processing, where it likely isn’t even necessary in the first place. Respect her on that. I seriously doubt she cares if it remains accessible on the web for the pervs worrying about censorship. It’ll still be there if you desperately don’t want to lose your opportunity to take a gander.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s a value to having a standard image or images that are used to assess compression algorithms’ performance. It could just as easily be a picture of a bouquet of flowers, or a bunch of puppies.

        • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          8 months ago

          Seems like this is a much more important than any of the other discussions going on. How many results were tainted by the fact that they were compressing a dithered print image.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, there is, so do not do that and let others do that if they want.

          Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned.

          FFS, it’s as if there could be only one way for everyone

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah. I was originally thinking this is just more of typical American prudishness, but if the impetus came from her, that’s a good enough reason to retire the pic.