For example, I’m using Debian, and I think we could learn a thing or two from Mint about how to make it “friendlier” for new users. I often see Mint recommended to new users, but rarely Debian, which has a goal to be “the universal operating system”.
I also think we could learn website design from… looks at notes …everyone else.

  • onlinepersona
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Seconded. NixOS’s documentation has consistently been the worst I’ve read, always forcing me to go to the source code to try and understand what in the world is happening. It makes quick changes to new things nigh impossible. I had to resort to taking notes when I understood things about nix in order to retain the knowledge or at least link to where I could easily regain it.

    The nixos wiki was marginally better and https://nixlang.wiki/ has been better. However the latter is less known so has less content. All in all, nix documentation is still bad.

    Anti Commercial AI thingy

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Laser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      NixOS has the best concept and even pioneered it, but whether its implementation and documentation is perfect is a topic for debate.

      However, it’s been quite long since I had to fiddle with my config and as such, the downsides don’t really affect one on a daily basis. In fact, I recently reinstalled my machine to change the root filesystem and it was an absolute breeze. If not for secure boot, it would have been absolutely trivial, and with secure boot it was easy and convenient.

      As such, I consider the pains an investment into system that runs much better down the road. Though I’d love it if these pains were reduced.