On Monday, it appears X attempted to encourage users to cease referring to it as Twitter and instead adopt the name X. Some users began noticing that posts viewed via X for iOS were changing any references of “Twitter.com” to “X.com” automatically.

If a user typed in “Twitter.com,” they would see “Twitter.com” as they typed it before hitting “Post.” But, after submitting, the platform would show “X.com” in its place on the X for iOS app, without the user’s permission, for everyone viewing the post.

And shortly after this revelation, it became clear that there was another big issue: X was changing anything ending in “Twitter.com” to “X.com.”

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know if there’s much to study about this… make a product shittier and then rebrand to remove any positive brand association with the product when it was better in the past. Yeah, that’s a bad idea.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s insane. It’s like bandaid changing their name. Everyone calls adhesive bandages bandaids. Everyone calls micro blogging tweets. (In this niche community of fediverse users maybe not.)

    • Zink
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah true, but nothing drives the point home like a huge embarrassing real world example!