• refalo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      with an x86 license

      doesn’t that still mean they are dependent on the West technically?

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        In it’s roots, yes. But the architecture isn’t banned, just the chips. As an analogy, China can make its own internal combustion engines and not buy Ford cars.

        • refalo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I meant, if they require a license to keep making x86 chips, what’s to stop Intel/the US from revoking it later on?

          • Miaou@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            At this point the licencing is only about Intel getting money, not about China being allowed to produce the chips, me thinks