plsgimmefrogs [they/he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoRulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down10
arrow-up1647arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.dbzer0.complsgimmefrogs [they/he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoSo your “their teeth were good due to different microflora” can be simplified to “their teeth were good because they didn’t have tooth damaging food”
minus-squareDaxtron2@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThe original claim was dental issues were generally a death sentence, which was true whether or not they’re more common now.
So your “their teeth were good due to different microflora” can be simplified to “their teeth were good because they didn’t have tooth damaging food”
The original claim was dental issues were generally a death sentence, which was true whether or not they’re more common now.