• mozzOP
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      I think there are individual spots that are bright or dim for no reason because of random noise, up in the no-particular-pattern wilderness

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      145 months ago

      Maybe people are setting it up at home using a numberpad? In that case it would be just running a finger down the left side.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        That makes a lot more sense. I’m part of the TKL life so I’d probably never notice something like that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    What’s the big streak at 1000-1031, 1100-31 and 1200-1231?

    It could be brith date, but why only 10-12 specifically? I thought birth months were more normal distributed.

    • mozzOP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think that’s the overlap between the dense region of PINs that start with 11, 12, or 13 (similar to the dense regions that start with 21, 22, 23, 31, etc), and the dense square region of month+day dates.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I got a PIN assigned by my bank back in the 1980s, and it is in that range. I always assumed it was random, because how easy is it to generate a 4-digit random number? But maybe they gave out PINs more like safe combinations. I don’t think you could change them back then, either.

    • Tarquinn2049
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      I think that specific block is also more likely to be a street address in a city. So it has two reasons to be common easy to remember numbers.

  • 56!
    link
    fedilink
    25 months ago

    Anyone else getting a blank page? I had to go into inspect element and remove {opacity: 0} on the body to see anything.

    • mozzOP
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      It’s set to fade in from 0 opacity, for some sort of unnecessary “ooh look it’s fancy” effect. My guess is that if you check the console you’ll find that it hit some exception before it completed its little fade-in effect.

      • 56!
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It seems to be caused by the FediAct addon, which doesn’t make any sense. Disabling the addon fixes the page without needing a reload, so it must be a CSS issue rather than an exception. Edit: it seems the addon is overriding the fadeIn keyframe, but it looks fixed in the github version.

        • mozzOP
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Might be worth reaching out to the addon authors. Hard to say whether the page or the addon is at fault, but they might be interested to know it even if it’s the page’s fault.

          • 56!
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            It looks like it’s the addon’s fault, and has already been fixed in the github version. It’s also been abandoned, so it’s probably not worth keeping around anyway.