• downpunxx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Our tests indicate that you have strong protection against Web tracking.
    Is your browser: Blocking tracking ads? Yes Blocking invisible trackers? Yes Protecting you from fingerprinting? Your browser has a unique fingerprint

    Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 178,285 tested in the past 45 days.

    Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 17.44 bits of identifying information.

    Firefox/Windows 11/Privacy Badger/uBlock Origin

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I got almost the exact same result using DDG on a cheap android phone. Within .1 bits of identifying info.

    • panicnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I get 17.45 on an iPad Pro. This is with all extensions disabled and my adblocker off. They say I am unique in the past 45 days. Looking through the info I don’t see how this works. Could it be that no one else has tested with an iPad Pro? It’s not like the hardware in this model is different from a similar one. You really just cannot meddle with it. It’s a fairly locked down ecosystem.

      If I took an iPad, reset it and ran the test. Then reset it and ran the test again, would both be unique?

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      In my experience, you have thee choices. You can use NoScript and avoid enabling domains required for fingerprinting, you can turn on privacy.resistFingerprinting in about:config, or instead of focusing on not being fingerprinted, focus on guaranteeing your fingerprint will keep changing.

      • astreus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        I turned privacy.resistFingerprinting to true and now get an absolutely unique fingerprint on the tool

        • Artyom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That might be because it’ll be new every time.

          Edit: I haven’t done my homework about how good this post’s test is, but I use amiunique.org to compare browser settings.

        • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Be aware that any sites using HTML5 Canvas will probably be broken now. It breaks some other niche things too that may not be obviously related, so just keep that in mind if any site starts acting up.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Funny thing is, I had to enable scripts on that website in order for the test to work lol

      • Corhen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        similar, i used Random User Agent, it shows that i have a unique finger print… but the user agent of that fingerprint is not ‘my’ user agent, so in 30 mintutes i would appear as a different fingerprint

  • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Thanks for posting this! I installed privacy badger and modified my user agent as a result of the test. Very helpful insight that I didn’t have before.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Our tests indicate that you have strong protection against Web tracking.

    IS YOUR BROWSER:

    Blocking tracking ads? Yes

    Blocking invisible trackers? Yes

    Protecting you from fingerprinting? ◕ your browser has a randomized fingerprint

    Feels good man.

    • refalo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      lol this site is almost pointless, real security experts know this is just for making uninformed people feel better.

      creepjs will still positively fingerprint you every time. it’s simply impossible to be anonymous online.

      • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        that needs javascript to work. I largely block javascript on my browser. you are no a security expert, just misinformed

        • refalo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          blocking javascript makes you stand out WAY more. that basically narrows down the pool of possible people from a million to 3.

            • refalo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              using the eff site is not accurate because it just tests your browser against all the other people that opted in to be tested, and an abnormally high percentage of people who tested explicitly turn(ed) off javascript, which is not representative of the normal web browsing public.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Wow nice. Any opinions on how these fingerprinting evaluators compare?

    CreepJS:
    https://abrahamjuliot.github.io/creepjs

    EFF’s Cover Your Tracks:
    https://coveryourtracks.eff.org

    Am I Unique?:
    https://amiunique.org

    Sad a pretty stock iPhone that’s blocking via some filterlists and using iCloud Private Relay (a “VPN”) is so detectable! Should be so many browsers appearing similar but there’s always this & that that mean I’m unique.

    -my comment a month back & some discussion

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m completely unique, both AmIUnique and the CreepJS test highlighted my installed fonts and two webcams (one of them is actually a virtual redirect for my primary webcam, since the drivers are DirectShow-based)

      Would be interesting to see how my linux laptop performs, tbf it might be unique too considering it’s a mbp 2012. I remember running into at least one website I visited on it showing much higher prices compared to when I revisited the same website later from my windows desktop…

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 7748.22 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

    Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 12.92 bits of identifying information.

    Using Arc on iOS.

    Blocking tracking ads? Yes
    Blocking invisible trackers? Yes
    Protecting you from [fingerprinting] Partial protection
        • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          noscript also exists on chromium, so if there a browser that supports addons on IOS it most prolly will have it. But I wouldn’t worry about it too much. I don’t have noscript installed on my phone either for convenience sake

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    What are your browser config and settings? (Extensions, settings, about:config…)

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I feel like Firefox is better. Or onion is probably even better. Set your privacy settings to strict. I use iOS and my results were strong.

        Also go into your iOS settings and mess around. Disable all their bullshit. I’m not a super tech savvy person. My brother is in IT, but privacy is super important to me, so I go around, read stuff, turn off a bunch of their “share with” stuff, and their Siri bullshit and everything I can tinker with. There are a lot of iOS settings buried pretty deep in subpages. I’m not sure if the eff is checking those, but I’ve had to go down my list of apps and disable some Siri bullshit.

        Sorry I can’t be more specific, like I said, I’m not the tech savvy one. I just use bare bones stuff, disable things that sound fishy. It’s all worked out for me so far lol

  • powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    somewhat related, is there any way at all to enable high refresh rates while using resistFingerprinting, or something I could use instead of it? this is the only thing keeping me away from resistFingerprinting on Mull and Librewolf.

  • kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not sure if it’s just me, but the page wouldn’t load at all. I’m using pihole for network DNS blocking + privacy badger + noscript. Even when I allowed all the domains via noscript temporary trusting it just sat there and spun forever.

  • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Anyone know if its possible to change the HTTP_ACCEPT header in Firefox on Android? Apparently that alone is enough to uniquely identify me :(

    • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I use “Mull” on android it is a firefox fork and is pretty much arkenfox mobile and more. You can try switching to that