• Cringe2793@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    She has a very generic sounding American sultry woman voice, imo. Seems like a money grab to me. She’s not dumb, she sued Disney for some nonsense, and now she’s starting shit with the soon to be biggest company in the world.

    She’s just latching onto the fact that any time women complain about shit like this, and use words like sexism, gaslighting, misogyny, etc, it gets a lot of traction in the media.

    What a horrible woman.

      • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        I did. And unlike you, I can draw my own conclusions, rather than let the media dictate them for me.

        Maybe try thinking a bit, before simping for these celebs. She’s just taking the opportunity to get some money, that’s all. She’s purposely throwing these words around because she knows you white knights will freak out about it and jump on her side. It’s scary how easy it is to manipulate you guys.

        Well, I’m not gonna waste my time explaining to you. It’s not my job, and I just don’t want to. If you wanna simp for her, go ahead.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Mhmm… that’s why OpenAI asked her for permission to use her voice a while back? That’s why Altman joked about the new voice sounding like hers?

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Didn’t she sue Disney for breach of contract? That doesn’t sound like nonsense.

      • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Nope. She sued because she felt she was owed more money. Disney released the movie on their streaming service at the same time as it was released in cinema.

        There was no “breach of contract”, otherwise she would have won easily. Instead, she and Disney settled out of court. She was just being greedy. Disney probably didn’t want the bad publicity and paid her off.

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Settling out of court doesn’t imply no one did anything wrong lol.

          • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            It also doesn’t imply one did something wrong. They could just want to “pay the ransom” so their name doesn’t get spread through the mud.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I literally never said it did. But you did say it implied the opposite.

              • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Sure, believe what you want to believe. I literally cannot be bothered to educate you.

      • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Resorting to name calling I see 😂😂😂 that’s what happens when you know I’m right, but refuse to change your wrong views.

        • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Oh honey. Oh no that wasnt an insult. Id be more creative! I was stating a fact. Your posting history shows us that the Phantasm of scapegoat is allowing you to stand on both sides of the contradiction, simultaneously.

          So, you can keep going down this path youre on. We both know where it leads though. Loneliness, and nothing good.

          OR: Watch this Kratos lookin guy break down what’s been going on in this area of thought for over a decade, and begin to heal, and then maybe you’ll be able to make friends with people without expecting anything in return.

          You deserve that. You deserve to be on both sides of that, and not the phantasm.

          • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s a lot of assumptions you’re making about me. I mean, if you can’t believe that scarjo is doing this for the money, then so be it.

            Far be it from me to try to tell you how to think. Believe what you want. I really can’t be bothered to correct you. And yes, what you’re doing is name calling, just because I believe a different thing from you. I shall not be replying to you any more, since you have no basic respect. Cheers!