• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    401 month ago

    On May 17, the National Park Service officially determined that park rangers and other employees cannot attend Pride festivities and parades in uniform. This decision reverses a long history of allowing such participation and even having official delegation in Pride parades across the United States. Anonymous LGBTQ+ employees report feeling betrayed and note that official Pride participation in major cities is uncertain as multiple parades finalize and applications to participate in parades remain unprocessed. The move comes amid increasing crackdowns on Pride flags and LGBTQ+ people nationwide. In most cases, Republican legislators and appointees have been behind such bans, but this time, it appears the National Park Service, led by a Biden-approved director, is restricting park participation in LGBTQ+ celebrations.

  • deweydecibel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    So by the sound of it, no one is being bared from participating, and the Pride events in the parks are not cancelled, though a bunch of approvals for participation in other events are waiting on a decision.

    Just can’t use the official NPS uniforms.

    Ok. Fair enough.

    Every NPS employee should get custom shirts that state clearly who they work for. Maybe even design them to look similar to the uniforms. March in those, and leave no question who you are. Then we’ll see what happens.

    • @zero_spelled_with_an_ecks
      link
      241 month ago

      A federal government organization is pulling back from openly supporting lgbtq+. It’s a big fuck you to the community and a big deal. Somebody decided that supporting that community was a bad look and had the power to be a dick about it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 month ago

        That somebody is Charles “Chuck” Sam’s the third, a Biden appointment and first native American to serve in the position.

    • BoscoBear
      link
      fedilink
      -11
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For the same reason police shouldn’t be allowed to participate in white power marches in their uniforms. They are supposed to be neutral.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 month ago

        Imagine equating hate groups associated with lynching to groups seeking equal rights and protections. You’re a clown

        • BoscoBear
          link
          fedilink
          -7
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Ok. Same reason firefighters are not supposed to let their kids wear their helmet while selling lemonade. They are supposed to be impartial.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -15
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Anonymous LGBTQ+ employees report feeling betrayed

    I don’t really see the problem. Don’t go in your National Park Service uniform and you can participate. The organization doesn’t want to get pulled into political disputes and isn’t going to want their endorsement to be implied one way or the other. The employees in question aren’t acting as spokesmen for the NPS (and if they were, then I can say that the restrictions they’d run into would be a lot more severe, like being told what they can and can’t say).

    Most people aren’t going to be wearing uniforms anyway, because their jobs don’t involve a uniform.

    That’s also not specific to the NPS or to Pride stuff. The military also has a lot of restrictions on what people can be doing politically when wearing uniform, because the military isn’t supposed to be playing in politics. It works for the public, and the public makes the political calls.

    • @zero_spelled_with_an_ecks
      link
      171 month ago

      Withdrawing support that’s already been there in this organization is specific, actually. This wasn’t a call made by the public, it was made by the people running the org. The decision itself is political. If you think the military isn’t supposed to be political, you must have thought don’t ask don’t tell was complete BS, right? Or is it ok when it’s politically conservative?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        Especially at a time when LGBTQ+ people are currently being attacked by the terrorists within our own government passing laws preventing them from getting healthcare and being able to discuss their families.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -28
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I mean maybe quit fucking in the woods

    yall might think i’m joking or being whateverist but there’s a nice thicketed section of the waterfront in Toronto and there always people fucking in there. I used to bike past it on my commute, never saw any women going in. Thought it was just a nice path til I went in and was immediately propositioned. I mean I see the appeal of fucking outside but designated outdoor orgy zones are a little much

    Even that’s a little hysterical though to connect to the NPS being dickfighters I suppose.

    edit: 34 little bitches who can not read, f, u, c, k, i, n, g! one in the bush, one in the tree, one on the bus right next to me

    I didn’t realise fucking in public was this popular IRL. It’s probably not, but anyway, sorry everyone!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 month ago

      What the fuck does a story you made up about people off of a path in Toronto have to do with park rangers in the US? Maybe stop being such a bigot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -101 month ago

        Oh, does the NPS not do forests? i guess there can be no possible connection!

        Oh, I get it, you want to go and I didn’t tell you where. It’s here! In the Frolicking Trails, i mean you can’t make this shit up. Don’t get me wrong I’d be down there every day if I didn’t already have this other life, now you stop being obtuse and ornery, ya silly bitch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          A connection to random people? Are you actually claiming that US park rangers are traveling to Toronto parks to touch your chest? WTF is wrong with you?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -8
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            lmao yes that’s what i’m saying. You’re definitely worth talking to - an excellent conversationalist and not at all a boring idiot! Have a great day! bubye

            edit: Sorry, that was crotchety of me, but I did ask you to stop being obtuse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -71 month ago

        yeah the dude who ran his finger down my chest as I made apologies and tried to retreat was definitely a wakeup call

        • Todd Bonzalez
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          So one guy flirted with you, and that was your wakeup call to become deeply homophobic?

          lmao, poor baby…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            If not wanting to fuck randos in public makes me a homophobe then so be it I guess, I guess all the prostate orgasms I have and all the anal sex I get done to me I suppose just makes me more phobic too, right, you squawking parrot?

            QQ

            Seriously though I linked the park elsewhere in the thread if you need a hookup