• hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    That the charges weren’t made until late last year is also a failure, the whole process has been unreasonable long.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That was part of the game though. If any part of that process was sped up for him the Republicans would have ammo in their accusations about the trial. And rich people have long made sure the justice system goes slowly.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean the reasons exist but if the system cannot rapidly respond to attempts to destroy it then those attempts will succeed.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes, but it’s important to remember that there are multiple players in this game. The Democrats and the prosecutors want the trial done before then but they can’t be seen to be speeding it up or even to be impatient. This gives the defense and the Republicans plenty of opening to show the trial down.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              They did start the process very early though. The problem is there’s a whole thing before bringing charges that they had to go through. They aren’t skipping any step because that could be grounds for an appeal. Even before officially opening an investigation they had to make sure they had the grounds to do that. So there was an investigation before the investigation, likely trying to get something less ephemeral than speech=riot; like direct ties to fake electors. Then they can start the official investigation where they get people on the record in meetings with the FBI. Finally when that’s gone far enough they can get a grand jury to look at everything. Then finally they can charge Trump and start preparing for a trial.

              In both of the investigative phases anyone partial to Trump can slow them down by rescheduling repeatedly and lying to investigators. (Which has already resulted in charges for some of them because it’s much easier to prove.) Then the grand jury doesn’t usually meet every day, in fact they may only meet once a week.

              Taking two years to figure out there was a connection, and another year to gather enough evidence for a grand jury isn’t unusual. Especially in cases involving rich and influential people.

              • hglman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Look at the lib escalate into a spiraling web of complexity in order to justify failure. No, the timeline here was unreasonable and will allow trump to win again. The Dems have served up a silver platter to the wealthy.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I agree that it’s unreasonable. But it’s how the system works with rich people. Meaning this isn’t abnormal.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Merrick Garland is a conservative. He did exactly what the world knew he would do when the neoliberal president appointed him.