• HogsTooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Nobody begins to tackle the constitutionality of Biden leaving after some of the primaries have closed. Every primary that has closed will not have had the opportunity to vote for whoever replaces Biden. The right will rip us a new one for installing a candidate without voting for them and for once they’d be right. With democracy on the line we cannot forgo democracy.

      • HogsTooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve never heard of this. If Biden does win the primary would this still be an option or is it dependent on him coming up short?

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s still an option.

          America doesn’t have legal constructs around political parties so whatever the fuck the democrats do won’t go against US law - its all just “tradition”.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Democratic delegate voting rules require the delegates to “in good conscience” vote for who they were sent there to vote for unless they’re released by that candidate. Realistically, an open convention will only happen if Biden releases his delegates.

          • Tramort
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I disagree. A delegate could vote for someone else in good conscience due to health reasons of the nominee they represent.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Maybe? But they also might get sued and/or blacklisted from party politics. There was an interview with various delegates and even those who thought someone else should be the candidate they believed they were obligated to vote for Biden.

    • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not entirely democratic at the convention, even in a typical election cycle. Recall that 15% of the delegates are “unpledged party leaders and elected officials” (superdelegates).

      That aside, I don’t think there’s a constitutional issue here with respect to replacing Biden. If Dems decided to select the candidate via musical chairs or Parcheesi, to my knowledge that’s a party matter (though voters would undoubtedly take a dim view of such antics).

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It depends on how things are run, but unless there’s a pre-decided consensus choice, multiple ballots would be likely.

          And for this choice I’m not entirely sure it’s wrong for party leaders and elected officials to have a vote. It’s not like the Biden delegates were selected at random from the public to represent it in a momentous decision. No one thought the delegates would be anything other than a formality. They were likely selected as a reward for service to Biden or as a favor to some local official.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Same, I actually prefer a party-leadership and elected officials decide process to the primary system we have now. FiveThirtyEight did a series of podcasts about the history of the US primary system and it really brought me around to disliking the way we do it. There’s a reason that almost no other country votes on candidates for party nominations the way we do. Here’s the link: https://fivethirtyeight.com/tag/the-primaries-project/ I recommend listening to all four episodes, but the third in particular was excellent.

        • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          2018, right? But there hasn’t been a contested convention since the rule change. Could be quite the circus, for good or ill. Multiple ballots more likely? Guess we’ll see.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            There hasn’t been a brokered convention in the modern era of the primary system (post-1968). It would 100% be a circus. Good for TV, probably exciting, almost certainly bad for the party and its candidate. My guess would be that everything would be handled by the prospective nominees before the convention itself to avoid looking like a hot mess in front of the nation.

            The West Wing had a brokered convention that went like seven ballots. Was a good episode IIRC.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are no constitutional implications to a party’s nomination process so long as it doesn’t violate the law with regard to discrimination and the like. If Biden withdrew you get a brokered convention. If he withdrew after being nominated, the party’s rules would place his VP nominee at the top of the ticket (although ballots would likely still have his name due to state laws and logistics).

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Uhh like how the people of New Hampshire had the opportunity to vote?

      You’re a bit late to the party if you think there is any democracy in the DNC. Bernie showed that already.