Some government employee made the “new logo” in the 90s for NCSA software (the Common Gateway Interface), and government work is public domain.

Just more evidence that big brother shall releaseth thee work and soul /s

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s a prism. You can’t copyright just drawing a prism. (You could probably trademark it, but a trademark would only apply in a particular context.)

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m saying that while any specific drawing of a prism is protected by copyright, the general concept isn’t. Drawing a prism, even one that looks almost identical to the one on the album cover, is not restricted. (I’m not sure we actually disagree.)

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, OP just said some weird stuff.

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      That reasoning would apply to tons of other logos too. Like “you cannot copyright a drawn apple with a piece bitten off”.

      • IHeartBadCode@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        you cannot copyright a drawn apple with a piece bitten off

        That’s correct, you can not do such. Apple does not litigate its logo with copyright but in trademark disputes. Prepear and Georette are examples of this.

        You too can create a logo of an apple with a piece bitten off. It’s up to a court to decide if it’s coming too close to the Apple trademark, most people want to just avoid that and settle amicably, but if you’ve got to the pocket change to fight it in court, you can argue that your bitten off apple isn’t a trademark infringement.

        If you find a company that isn’t keen to defend their logo, you can totally get away with it. Apple is on the other end of the spectrum of being someone who will protect their trademarks to the bitter end. Jack Daniels and Disney are two more examples of companies that will legally punch a five dollar start up into a bloody mass over trademarks.

  • folkrav@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    ackhyually the rainbow isn’t a gradient and the cone of light is too bright so its totally different dude

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      it’s a vector recreation of this low-quality gif, which you can’t really tell whether it was a gradient or not. but the colors are indeed kinda different and more accurate to an actual rainbow lol

  • 7fb2adfb45bafcc01c80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I found the whole copyright thing at Wikipedia for this image pretty funny.

    Even the simplest research shows that NCSA is a state-funded agency (through the University of Illinois system), not federal. If that image is in the public domain, it’s not for the reason Wikipedia lists.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It operates as part of the U of I system and receives most funding from the National Science Foundation, a federal agency.

      • 7fb2adfb45bafcc01c80@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It did get a lot of funding from the NSF in the early days, but the federal government didn’t start pushing for public access to research done through grants and contracts until 2013. Before then it was only work done by federal agencies that was non copyrighted.

        The National Science Foundation also didn’t start funding Mosaic until 1994, which was after CGI had been released.

        NCSA gets a lot of its funding from the private sector with partner programs, the University of Illinois, and the State of Illinois as well.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You don’t have to release something to have it be public domain. The NCSA is a state-federal partnership, to which the law about government non-copyright applies.

          • 7fb2adfb45bafcc01c80@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I’m not sure where you’re getting your information.

            I work there, have worked there for nearly three decades, and I can tell you that it’s not the case.

            (Also, it’s just NCSA for trademark reasons, without ‘the’ in front)

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Is the government able to commit copywriter infringement? With this logic, I could take a picture of Mario with a bowtie drawn on his chest and upload it to the Library of Congress website, thus making my image public domain.

    Actually I Think that would be trademark infringement. Why is copywright law so confusing.