Rightwing playbooks used in past election campaigns are being dusted off for an all-out assault on the vice-president

For Barack Obama there was “birtherism” and a name they said sounded like a specific Middle East terrorist. For Hillary Clinton there was “Lock her up” and merchandise that said, “Trump that bitch”, “Hillary sucks but not like Monica” and “Life’s a bitch: don’t vote for one.”

Rightwing playbooks deployed in past election campaigns are being dusted off for an all-out assault against Vice-President Kamala Harris, the de facto Democratic nominee aiming to become the first Black woman and first person of south Asian descent to be US president.

It’s obvious that the Republicans are going to play the race and gender card, which we’ve seen already in some of the attacks on social media,” said Tara Setmayer, a Black woman who is co-founder and chief executive of the Seneca Project, a women-led super political action committee. “It may be catnip for their Maga base but it will be a turnoff for the moderate voters in the battleground states that will determine this election.”

        • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          I linked to the Democrats platform and to this plan, written by the Trump team, for a fascist dictatorship in the US.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            5 months ago

            The fact that you felt the need to link to Project 2025 implies that the Democrats are defined by being opposed to it.

            • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              That’s quite a leap. You inferred something, I didn’t imply it. I simply posted a link to the Democrats platform which laysout their vision and policy and a link to the Republican platform which lays out their vision and policy. Any inference is entirely in your head.

              We’re very lucky that the Republicans published a detailed 900 page roadmap for turning the US into a fascist theocratic dictatorship. It’s impossible to deny, now, since everyone can see it with their own two eyes.

            • Rusty Shackleford
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              One (or many) can be opposed to a platform or ideology while simultaneously advocating for a different platform or ideology.

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The fact you’re talking about the Democrats implies you are defined by them.

              And the fact I am talking to you means you define me.

              And the fact that I mentioned that means we are both defined by our struggle to avoid the things that define us, or something.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 months ago

      From her speech the other day (in conjunction with Biden) these appear to be her focuses:

      1. The middle class

      2. Voting rights

      3. Reproductive rights (limited to a bill, no mention of stuffing the Supreme Court)

      4. Justice Reform

      5. Gun Control

      Hopefully we get more information over the best while and some formalization at the convention.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      I disagree the ban on non competes is a recent example of how this administration is helping the working class.

        • Riskable
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          5 months ago

          So what you’re saying is that conservatives are once again holding up stop signs when progress presents itself.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            5 months ago

            Because Democrats let them because they refused to attempt Court packing, which is the only way to stop the fascist agenda.

            • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m for it, but increasing the size requires a Congressional majority. Sadly, we’re not there. FDR took a run at it and fractured the party. The fear is that if Democrats are able to do it, then the next Republican majority will do the same. I don’t think this consideration has merit. They are likely to do it anyway should they have the ability when the court doesn’t have a right bias.

              I think there are better ways to go about it. The whole structure is flawed as it concentrates a wealth of power to small amount of people. Something like using a lottery composed of the federal appellate court judges for each case. In theory, many cases could be tried simultaneously as there are about 180. Those bringing the cases would also not have insight as to the court’s composition. They’d have to rely solely on the merit of their case.

              I like this item. It’s a bit dated, and the source leans left; but so does reality:

              https://www.alternet.org/2019/06/here-are-4-ways-to-expand-the-us-supreme-court

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I used “refused” in the past tense. I’m pretty sure that route is gone. Democrats will never have the majorities they need because this Court has made so many anti-democratic and pro-corruption rulings as to render the electoral process into a joke.

                Gratuities are legal now! It is now legal to give a politician money as thanks for passing legislation. It’s not “bribery” because it occurs after the act, you see, and so therefore it’s just protected speech. I’m sure Clarence Thomas is happy about that one.

                But! Dems could still run on the issue as a way to sway voters! But they’re too scared because, as you said, then Republicans will just do it too and it’ll probably lead to a civil war. So. Uh. Whatever I guess, country is fucked.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The Court is the key to the fascist’s agenda and the way they keep scoring victories despite being a minority Party.

                Either the fascist Court is dealt with politically or… what? Tell me something that wouldn’t get us banned for talking about.

        • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do you mean the Raimondo decision? That has no direct bearing. At worst, it means the FTC rule is more susceptible to challenge. But if you look at the actual court cases, it is being upheld. One judge in Texas temporarily delayed the ban for a small number of employers, and that is the biggest challenge so far.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean democrats categorically support unions, support reproductive rights, support protecting the environment… They do have a platform that isn’t “not Republican”. It’s just that republicans know their platform (project 2025 really) is so wildly unpopular they have to focus not on that, they have to focus on tearing down the opposing candidate.

      In terms of helping the working class: taxing the wealthy and wealthy corporations more will help the working class. Improving access to low cost / affordable healthcare will help the working class. Having strong unions will help the working class.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      No, that’s just ‘‘I’m rubber your glue’’ bullshit. It isn’t so. Just like CNN isn’t FoxNews for Liberals, and there’s absolutely no cult of personality for Unkie Joe, as you can see from him stepping down, and left wing engagement went WAY up.

      It’s not enough to simply claim there’s no platform, there is, it’s not just ‘‘Trump bad’’. But to be fair, he is promising to create a dictatorship and end our country in order to remake it in his image.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      To be fair the Democrats don’t have a platform other than

      I’m sorry you’re ignorant. But the good news is that you can actually do something about. Go ahead! Give it a try.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I saw her speech to the DNC the other day. She used a bunch of weasel words like “affordable” healthcare, “middle class” , assault weapons ban, etc. These things range from meaningless to barely a move in the right direction. Y’all got tricked into thinking the conservative corporate candidate is so progressive because she is compared to the fascist option. It’s a bunch of B.S.

        • enbyecho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          And I suppose you have a viable alternative non-incrementalist approach that is going to be appealing to the majority of voters.

            • enbyecho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Take control of the DNC away from the center right and get progressives in charge.

              And in your mind does that get more or less votes overall? Does it actually win elections?

              Because incredibly, not everyone is progressive. I know, it’s insane to me too. But that’s the unfortunate reality.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                It’s almost as if they’re saying things like universal healthcare can’t win elections and instead need to seize power from the top down. Which really undersells the appeal of these programs.

                • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’m saying I want universal healthcare and Dems won’t do it. They want to give health insurance companies and private hospitals a shitton of taxpayers money and keep insurance tied to employment. It’s a crock of shit.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You’re wrong. Some wisdom for you: If you’re always wrong about something, and only people who hold precisely the exact same viewpoints as you agree, you should consider looking into it yourself. Because the question is no longer whether you’re right, it becomes about who is the most correct, and whether you personally care enough and are brave enough to challenge your own viewpoint.

      Yeah, we are a bit of a microcosm here. However, when it comes to people on the left you can at least trust that most of us will go around correcting one another, often to our own detriment.