• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Thanks for making me ashamed of my state, asshole. Then again, my love is actually for the Bay Area and specifically Oakland, so little change there. Fuck off, Gavinator.

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The growing homeless problem is forcing him to embrace the ruling. Why would he ignore the problem?

          “prioritizes removal of encampments that pose threats to life, health, and safety, while partnering with local governments and nonprofit providers to facilitate offers of shelter and supportive services in advance of removal.””

          • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Before the 9th circuit stopped it, homeless sweeps were wholeheartedly embraced as the de facto solution. Somehow, over forty years of homeless sweeps, it doesn’t seem to have solved the problem.

            It’s because encampment sweeps aren’t a fix, it’s just blasting money out of the government’s ass to temporarily wallpaper over the problem and make life harder on the people who’ve been brought lowest in our society. He would be wise to remain on the path of housing reform and other reforms that California was starting to embrace when it didn’t have any other choice, that is, if he actually intends to fix the problem.