Some Republicans are starting to seriously regret Donald Trump’s vice presidential nominee, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance.

It’s been only one week since Vance was nominated at the Republican National Convention, and already his own party members are expressing severe doubts about Trump’s pick. The former president’s allies have acknowledged that nominating Vance was the product of Trump’s absolute certainty that he would be able to defeat Joe Biden in November. While Vance wouldn’t do much for swing voters or independents, he would likely shore up support among Trump’s base.

But ever since Biden passed the torch to Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party’s new presumptive nominee, Republicans have begun to sour on Vance.

“The road got a lot harder. He was the only pick that wasn’t the safe pick. And I think everyone has now realized that,” one House Republican told Axios Thursday, under the condition of anonymity.

Another House Republican told Axios that Vance “doesn’t add much.”

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 months ago

    The democrats had to know Biden was going to drop out when they scheduled the earliest presidential debate in history.

    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re talking an extraordinary amount of stupidity vs a moderate amount of planning.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If this election can teach us anything, if you live in a bubble then you have some incredibly stupid blind spots.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            The democratic party has as many bubbles as they have geriatric candidates. A candidate manages their staff, but the staff can also manage the candidate and it creeps into elderly abuse at a certain point. Look at Diane Feinstein or RBG: two people who should have retired but their staff didn’t want to loose their relative power so they filter what their boss sees. I’m sure the same is true for Trump. Biden at least has Pelosi to pull his head from his ass and showed him the real numbers his staff wasn’t showing.