• Riskable
    link
    English
    61 month ago

    The researchers focused specifically on 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF), a widespread persistent organic pollutant (POP) that is a byproduct of waste incineration, metal production, and fossil-fuel and wood combustion.

    Because the tree absorbed it? Anyone know?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      According to the 100% acurate and never wrong Chat GPT

      2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) is not naturally present in trees or wood. It is a byproduct of the combustion process, particularly when wood or other organic materials are burned in the presence of chlorine or chlorine-containing compounds. TCDF belongs to a group of toxic compounds known as dioxins and furans, which are produced when chlorinated materials are burned at certain temperatures.

      In wood combustion, the presence of chlorine (from treated wood, certain environmental pollutants, or contaminants in the wood) can lead to the formation of these compounds. The specific structure of TCDF forms during combustion due to the interaction of chlorine with organic molecules in the wood under high temperatures.

      So, TCDF is a result of the combustion process rather than a component of the tree itself.

      And followup:

      is chlorine typically used in treating wood?

      ChatGPT said:

      Yes, chlorine-based compounds have historically been used in some wood treatments, although their use has become more restricted over time due to environmental and health concerns.

      So uh don’t burn wood scraps from old houses I guess.

      • Gamma
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        You should use > for quotes, 4 space indents render as code blocks and don’t wrap in some clients

        this

        vs

        this
        
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          It’s a kinda large block of text so when I accidently clicked the wrong button I just kinda left it.

          It’s fixed now.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    I’m confused, why is it classified as a forever chemical? It’s not PFAS.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      “Forever chemicals” are a category. It’s not a term that’s meant to be synonymous with PFAS. PFAS is just an example of one.

    • Yep, @[email protected] knows what’s up. PFAS are one group of forever chemicals. While 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) shares many characteristics with “forever chemicals” like PFAS, including persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity, it belongs to a different chemical class (Persistent Organic Pollutants aka POPs). Nonetheless, its environmental and health impacts are significant, and efforts are needed to reduce its presence in the environment!