The Chinese studio granted early access on the condition that topics like “feminist propaganda” and “Covid-19” go unmentioned. What followed is the Streisand effect in full force.

“I feel that it only served to bring more attention on Game Science’s culture of sexism,” linktothepabst says. “All they had to do was let the game speak for itself, but it came off, to me, like an own goal, effectively stoking the flames between the people who were using this game as weapon against ‘wokeness in games’ and those who can level-headedly either enjoy the game and criticize GS or just ignore the game altogether.”

It’s the Streisand effect in full force: Try to hide something, and it becomes all the more visible. “Nobody was going to bring up Chinese politics unprompted,” Zhong says, “but the topic was there as soon as they released those guidelines.”

    • parpol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you know what gamer gate refers to? It doesn’t have anything to do with gatekeeping is why I mention it.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It was called Gamergate because of The Watergate Scandal. It was a fad for almost 40 years in US media to add “gate” to the end of whatever scandal was going on. Any gatekeeping meaning was added well after the fact

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            4 months ago

            No, it’s called gamer gate because every major scandal is just called blah gate after watergate. It was not called gamer gate because of gatekeeping.