• Isoprenoid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        If those subsidies are coming from the government that means the burden is shifted to taxpayers.

        Which means the common man is not only being grifted at the store with his hard earned, after-tax dollar, the tax portion of his earnings are also being grifted.

        • psvrh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Time to institute a specific tax on Loblaw, Empire, Metro and Save-On that goes directly to farmers.

          I would add, though, that while farming is not always profitable, the bulk of land is owned by “farmers” that are very wealthy. They’re more like real estate investors that employ professional farm managers, then actual farmers.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is completely insane and unsurprising. I’ve always wanted to get my hands on comparisons like these.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The OBVIOUS Solution is to allow these Conglomerates to BUY Competitors! That will Reduce Prices on Consumers and Raise Profits of the Workers!

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is the drastic upward slope of bread around 2004+ when Loblaws and others started the bread price fixing?