• Python
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I find AI summaries so damn tedious to read, they just keep repeating themselves over and over again :(

        • pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          In conclusion, the conclusion most often concludes by concluding that we can conclude, that the answer is the answer.

          To summarize, the summary most often summarizes the problem and its nuances, and concludes by summarizing the conclusion as the correct answer.

          Therefore, the correct answer is correct.

          Let me know if there is anything else I can help you with today.

          • P1nkman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            And if it does not work, let’s try another approach.

            Gives exact same information/instructions

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lots of people seem to like them. I’ve read several AI summaries also here on Lemmy. And they kind of always miss the nuance. Oftentimes they entirely miss the point. So much that it sometimes becomes wrong.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    One evaluator highlighted this problem by calling out an AI summary for being “wordy and pointless—just repeating what was in the submission.”

    Basically sums up my view of AI generated text, it has a certain waffle to it that is very distinctive, regardless of the source.

  • daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Clickbait.

    They tested it on a single, year old model (Llama2-70B), which is way below state of the art.