• UlrikHDA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would never be an option for Stackoverflow

      • DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well guy complains about compensation for his “work”. I assume he’s ready to shell out a few dollars for when he’ll need it :-)

        • UlrikHDA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          His “work” as you put it, is the only thing of value on the site. SO without users to provide answers are worth zero dollars, so I’m not sure why you put work in quotation mark.

          • DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because if he’s able to help anyone on SO, he very likely profited many, many times from free access to knowledge there before he got to this point. Given activity of average user he probably gained orders of magnitude more than he given.

            I find rambling about money and compensation in such context distasteful.

            SO provided platform which, while not perfect is used by millions of people. They aren’t overloaded with ads and dark patterns as many of the clones. If it’s worthless, why people are using it instead self hosted blogs for example?

              • DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                if that were not true, they wouldn’t be in business.

                Why? They are not loosing anything while developers are gaining time using their website.

                They had 66 million dollars revenue in 2021. They have about 20 million registered users (and much more unregistered, and that’s revenue not income, but let’s forget that). Do you really, honestly feel, that SO doesn’t save you $3 worth of time per year?

                • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I use stackoverflow for minutes at a time and it almost never has answers to the questions I need answers to. if it has an answer, it’s usually “you can’t do that”. reference docs are 100% of the time more helpful. so no, I don’t think so.

                  • DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Why do you go there then? If you don’t, they won’t get their $3 out of you and universe is in balance again :-)