• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 hours ago

    I still think targeted ads should be illegal. I would accept static ads that are based on the content of the site rather than me as a compromise.

    So like if I’m looking at example.com/cool-bikes you can show me bike ads. You don’t need to know who I am or track me.

    It’s good enough for the past few decades (centuries?) it’s good enough for now. The Superbowl doesn’t serve a different ad to every viewer.

    • RubberDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 hours ago

      Yeah or bike adjacent stuff… helmet, chain lube… hell even a biking vacation… but stop with the profiling

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1215 hours ago

    Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

    It indiscriminately pollutes the environments it’s projected in to, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising the mass hoarding of personal information which is uneconomical to appropriately secure.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 days ago

    Firefox plus uBlock Origin is what you can do about it. I hardly ever see any ads. SponsorBlock is great if you watch youtube too.

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    English
    31 day ago

    What really annoys me is the endless stream of scam, “earn money fast with 1 simple trick” ads

    It’s literally a scam every single time and trying to report those fall into deaf ears (or blind algorithms) because hey, they’re paying to be shown, why should any high ranking executive care? “Oh, I can’t be held responsible, sorry!”

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Garbage ads have been a thing almost since the dawn of the Internet and we found a solution to them years ago. They’re called ad blockers. If you are online and not using an ad blocker: Why? That’s like finding a $2/night hooker and not using a condom.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 days ago

      The article did mention ad-blockers:

      Some users take back control from online ads by installing ad-blocker software. These can be free versions in the form of a browser extension, or more advanced versions with a subscription fee.

      I think you underestimate how technologically illiterate the average person is. Many people do not even understand the difference between a web browser and a search engine - they use Chrome because they think that’s the only way to perform a Google search.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 hours ago

        My kids are not what I’d call tech illiterate but they are growing up with all of it taken for granted. They don’t really understand the terms “internet” as distinct from “website” as distinct from “your phone.” It’s just kind of all “on your phone” to them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ew. Speaking of technological illiteracy, the author is irresponsibly contributing to it by insinuating that subscription fee ad blockers are somehow inherently better than free ones, which is not only absolute bullshit but also pretty much anti-Free Software propaganda.

    • paraphrand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      I was promised that surveillance capitalism would mean high quality ads that improved my quality of living. :blessed:

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        When I can’t block the ads, I always opt for the “non-personalized ads” option, since I know they are getting paid less. Also easier to ignore an ad when it is random.

    • Zier
      link
      fedilink
      62 days ago

      $2/a night? Okay Mr Moneybags, must be nice to be so rich!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 days ago

    For example, Google Chrome has stopped the use of auto-play video.

    Even setting aside ads, that was virtually always something that I did not want.

    If websites like CNN want someone to watch video, put the video up with autoplay off. If someone wants to watch it, they can start it playing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But then they can’t force you to watch claim that you watched the ad at the start of the video for that sweet advertiser revenue.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 days ago

    Remember the purpose of ads is to advertise a product that might potentially sell. Quality control isn’t always a priority it’s capitalism after all. At the end of the day, if you just want to block ads, just block ads.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      there are products that I would buy if I would know they exist but I don’t because they don’t have enough money to do advertisment. It’s inherently an unfair competition. The only ads that I would like to see is a tematical search for all of the buyable products and services.

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 days ago

    Because it’s “too hard” for websites to have proper relationships with advertisers vs just signing onto an ad network.