• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    8 minutes ago

    A lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me here. I don’t want poor people to starve, nor do I want people to reuse needles. All I’m saying is that cash is a lot more universal and useful to food pantries than going to the store and buying cans is. Also many food pantries have deals with companies where they can get the food cheaper. So buying cans of food to donate is also a worse deal.

    Edit: I understand donating cans of food your household isn’t going to use, but in some school food drives for instance, students get extra credit for donating cans, which encourages people to go out and buy cans.

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    23 hours ago

    Whew, I wanna know what kinda shower led to this kind of thought so I can avoid it.

    For one thing, canned goods are damn near the best donation to a food bank because they’re so shelf stable.

    And, they’re as useful as monetary donations.

    If you wanted to use the same basic comparison it would be more like: donating cream of mushroom soup to a food bank is like donating syringes to a cancer research lab.

    Yeah, they’re both useful technically, but they don’t really help much

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      21 minutes ago

      canned goods are damn near the best donation to a food bank because they’re so shelf stable

      Cash doesn’t expire

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    239 hours ago

    Canned goods are non-perishable. Used needles carry contaminate. One is useful, the other isn’t.

    • @TheFogan
      link
      English
      48 hours ago

      Umm… is this post edited or something. I’m seeing

      Donating canned goods to food pantries is like donating needles and syringes to a cancer research organization

      I don’t see the word “used” in it. So, it sounds like he’s saying donating medical supplies to an organization that does medical research?

      To which I’d say yes both seem helpful to an organization that helps people in need.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        117 minutes ago

        To which I’d say yes both seem helpful to an organization that helps people in need.

        But cash is much more universal and allows the cancer research organization to get exactly what they need rather then whatever needles people feel like donating. It’s the same thing with food pantries. You can donate 10 cans of vegetable soup, but if the food bank doesn’t need that at the time, you’ve just wasted your money on vegetable soup when you could have just donated cash.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 hours ago

        I mean I guess, but if it’s an organization conducting medical research, I’d assume they already have all the syringes they’d need?

        It would probably mean a little more like you’re thinking if OP said “donate syringes to clinics and ERs” or something.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    148 hours ago

    It sounds like you just hate poor people. They aren’t addicted to food, they need it to live. You’ll probably be surprised to learn that people starve when they dont get food.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      14 minutes ago

      This is a strange take. I never said poor people should starve. In fact, I think they deserve better then just canned food. Therefore I suggest donating cash instead of canned goods. That way the food bank can buy fresher foods.

      Anyways, it seems like this statement definitely needed more explanation and context by me, which wasn’t possible when just posting it as a shower thought.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    98 hours ago

    I mean, the pantries ask for canned goods, because they’re shelf stable, portable, safe.

    Not sure where you think this is anything like used needles.