• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Typescript is always compiled down to JavaScript, so it’s kinda the same thing, but with “nicer” clothes.

      • LeFantome
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Rust does not compile down to C. It generates LLVM bytecode the same as Clang does. They both produce native executables. You do not need a C compiler on your system to run Rust binaries.

        Typescript produces JavaScript. You need a JavaScript interpreter to execute the output from TypeScript.

        Not the same thing.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          In before the pedants: clang is a c compiler, in that it compiles c code—but it also compiles other languages too. The distinction is that c, c++, rust, etc are compiled directly into byte code , whereas typescript is transpiled into another language (JavaScript) before it is executed. I’ll probably catch heat for this, but you can liken TypeScript to C++ because they both are supersets of another language.

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            C++ is actually not a superset of C, believe it or not.

            • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ll admit I’m no c/c++ aficionado, but after a little research I see what you mean. Originally, C++ was a superset of C, but C has since diverged to include things that are not in C++. So we are both correct.