• KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    183
    ·
    2 months ago

    This patent was first submitted in late July 2024 and granted the following month, after Nintendo and The Pokemon Company asked for an accelerated review process.

    What the fuck - so, they’re claiming infringement on a work that was released before they ever submitted their patent? How is that allowed? Are you telling me a company can wait until another company releases a similar product, then apply for a patent for something they used, then claim infringement? I knew patents were fucked, but I didn’t realize they were that fucked.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      121
      ·
      2 months ago

      How is that allowed?

      Well it’s not, you aren’t supposed to be able to get a patent for something that already exists. But you know, corruption

    • irish_link@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not. In fact you know how this kind of patent gets invalidated, by pointing out what’s know as prior art. Things that did “this” before that patent was filed. So Palworlds and any other game that involves capturing a creature. This “killer patent” won’t stand up in Court unless the Japanese Court is entirely different than the US and German Courts.

      • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The request for an expedited review of patent number 7545191 also facilitated the approval of three other patents from Nintendo and The Pokemon Company (7528390, 7493117 and 7505854). Kurihara noted that amending an existing patent for specific litigation purposes is an established industry practice, and possibly what happened in this particular case.

        This does not make sense to me.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not in tbe US it’s not.

      An existing implementation would be prior art and make it EXTREMELY easy to get the patent invalidated.

    • Die4Ever
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      yea that sounds nasty

      just don’t patent anything, other companies build a product around an unpatented idea, then you patent it and sue them? now their entire product is ruined??

      this makes no sense, that would mean the optimal play is to not patent anything until someone else starts doing it

  • recursive_recursion [they/them]A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nintendo’s stagnated and has become a patent troll

    as someone that used to be a fan I’m sad as it’s hard to be hyped for any of their games when they’re widely known for pulling these kinds of scummy tactics time and time again

    indies be dammed, it’s too much of a risk to make Nintendo-inspired games let alone direct fan-games

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          And is just an extension to their licensing nonsense and publishing deals thst came beforex

          Anyone surprised by any of this doesn’t care about Nintendo’s behaviour, just the impact the current move is having on their current fun.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a shame you can’t support nintendo’s developers while excluding their legal department. Oh well, the high seas mean I still get to enjoy what I want to

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Patents don’t protect art

      Edit: ok, apparently “prior art” might be a phase in US patent law. I don’t quite understand what it means. In my country patents protect functions, not expressions of ideas (art)

  • towerful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    Worth reading the article, but for the TL:drs and comment readers:

    • A patent attorney has narrowed down the list of potential candidates that could be central to Nintendo’s lawsuit against Palworld developer Pocketpair to 28 patents.
    • Out of those, one particular intellectual property describing creature-capture mechanics was labeled as a “killer patent” that would be difficult not to infringe when making a game with monster-taming elements.
    • The said property is part of a recently approved patent family consisting of three more patents, all of which were approved mere weeks before Nintendo and The Pokemon Company sued Pocketpair.
  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I just filed a patent for white rice so now all you rice eaters owe me $20

    I don’t care if that isn’t how IP law works, should a thought about that before eating all that rice ya dingus

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So first we can’t even get (unpaid) mods in other games that add/include Nintendo things in them, now Nintendo is just flexing their stupid balls at everything they can?

    Fuck this goddamn world, dude. This timeline fucking sucks.

    • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Keep watching. Everything unfortunately was chosen this way. The ruling class is experiencing their first real doses of reality. It won’t be over night changes, but it only gets worse for the ruling class from here. Sic semper tyrannis.

  • ozoned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    While I don’t know Japanese law, and folks are right in US law about prior art, I think everyone is missing the point.

    Companies like Nintendo don’t have to actually win. They probably created this patent as a throw away to force Pocketpair to waste money fighting it. It costs tons of money to hire an attorney, work through the process, etc. It takes YEARS.

    Nintendo probably wants to waste Pocketpair’s time and money OR they’re trying to get them to just settle and give Nintendo a cut of the profits.

    That’s how big tech works with tons of patents and how patent trolls keep leeching off society. I have a patent for a button, you have a phone you’re making. I say give me 1% of your profit. What’s 1% to you? You agree, we don’t go to court and the next person that does it I do the same thing, but now I show them how many people agreed and that person is scared and think I have a legit case.

    This shit is constantly happening in the background nonstop.

    Patent law, copyright law, they are fundamentally broken. But they won’t get fixed until something BIG happens.

    Nintendo is and always has been a bully. This is just another instance of it.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just stop buying Nintendo. I sure did, last 2 things I bought was used 6ish mo ago, and now I’m out for good. Never looking back. Nintendo’s boat is sunk. It’s going to be monumentus when Nintendo is crushed. They earned what happens next.

    • niisyth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look, I hate the Nintendo tax and legal bullying too.

      But having the second best selling system, up there with the PS2, I doubt they’re sunk anytime soon.

      • Belgdore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        And owning multiple of the largest game franchises including Pokemon which is larger than any other media franchise.