On Wednesday, Sanders introduced six resolutions blocking six sales of different weapons contained within the $20 billion weapons deal announced by the Biden administration in August. The sales include many of the types of weapons that Israel has used in its relentless campaign of extermination in Gaza over the past year.

“Sending more weapons is not only immoral, it is also illegal. The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act lay out clear requirements for the use of American weaponry – Israel has egregiously violated those rules,” said Sanders. “There is a mountain of documentary evidence demonstrating that these weapons are being used in violation of U.S. and international law.”

This will be the first time in history that Congress has ever voted on legislation to block a weapons sale to Israel, as the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project pointed out. This is despite the U.S. having sent Israel over $250 billion in military assistance in recent decades, according to analyst Stephen Semler, as Israel has carried out ethnic cleansings and massacres across Palestine and in Lebanon.

The resolutions are not likely to pass; even if they did pass the heavily pro-Israel Congress, they would likely be vetoed by President Joe Biden, who has been insistent on sending weapons to Israel with no strings attached.

However, Sanders’s move is in line with public opinion. Polls have consistently found that the majority of the public supports an end to Israel’s genocide; a poll by the Institute for Global Affairs released this week found, for instance, that a majority of Americans think the U.S. should stop supporting Israel or make support contingent on Israeli officials’ agreement to a ceasefire deal. This includes nearly 80 percent of Democrats.

    • 0x0
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t you mean left(ish)?

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I was curious as well, so I looked it up. Apparently he grudgingly supported the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, despite firmly opposing a similar action taken in 1995 with Croatia. He called the bombing borderline unconstitutional, but added that such an operation seemed necessary to prevent an ethnic cleansing.

          Not sure I would agree with the previous commenter since Yugoslavia doesn’t exist any more, so I doubt that a no longer in existence country has strong feelings about anything. I also believe the people would likely not want to reform a country that was created for them, especially since their actions in 1999 led to the country dissolving into two or three countries.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            the intervention in the Yugoslavian war in 1999 was the only moral answer. it’s like the trolley problem if the 5 people are replaced with several entire ethnic groups

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well, he was also a part of blocking the military aid to Ukraine for all those months. But this one is good

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hot take: Global geopolitics within the current rules as we understand it don’t allow for countries to genuinely respect each other as equals. Might will always be right on the global stage regardless of whether it should be that way. So when it comes to picking a global hegemon, the United States is really not a terrible choice compared with the alternatives.

          • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ukraine is not, objectively could not qualify before 2014 when it became good for the US war machine for them to qualify, and most importantly, NATO should’ve disbanded in 1991 when the sole reason for its existence fell.

            • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, our country is shitty. I get the main reason the US joined the allies had more to do with politics then ideology. But least some kind of good comes from the US backing ukraine.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              1991 when the sole reason for its existence fell

              Russia still exists so what are you on about?

              The soviet union doesn’t, but the power was always concentrated into Russia, and guess what, Russia wants their territory back now. The countries which existed under the USSR and never want Russian rule again? Russia sees them as rightfully theirs. I for one am glad to have NATO protection. And I’m glad something is being done to help our brothers in Ukraine, because they weren’t as lucky as we were, to join the EU and NATO.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s easy to rage against the machine on a moral pedestal. It’s harder to actually steer the machine in the right direction.

      To be clear, I am supportive of putting things to a vote even if there’s no chance it succeeds. Get the votes on record. I think that’s an important archive that can be used later in election season to hold politicians accountable for their votes.

      I like what Bernie and AOC are doing when they push for these kinds of votes.

      But make no mistake. They can only do this from a position of being unable to effect any change. Under normal conditions, moves like this poison the well and make others on both sides less willing to work with you.

      They have the luxury of grandstanding specifically because they have zero hope of garnering support.

      Someone like a president can’t really do something like this without completely burning their political capital.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Someone like a president can’t really do something like this without completely burning their political capital.

        If only we had a president who is never going to hold office again and has nothing to lose right now… Damn our current pres is nothing like that

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          You realize his actions have a direct impact on Harris’ campaign… right?

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            You realise Biden’s current stance on Israel is unpopular by a vast majority of the Democratic voter base, right?

            • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              I couldn’t find much, but this poll seems to suggest the majority supports the US position on Israel. It’s surprisingly bipartisan.

              Do you have another source maybe? This poll is from June, maybe you found something more recent?

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                That poll isn’t about any specific policy

                Polls:

                Quotes

                In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

                Quotes

                Quotes

                Quotes

                Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

                Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

              • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                That poll is about opinions on the US’s role, and says nothing about Israel.

                It’s an absolutely bonkers result considering the US’s decades of destabilizing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets in other countries like Yemen and Syria, alliance/support of terrorist states like Saudi Arabia and Israel, and imperial/extractive attitude that has been the primary force destabilizing the region in my lifetime.

                The idea that ANYONE can look at the middle east and have a positive view of America’s role is disgusting. America’s disastrous 21st century foreign policy is the primary reason that the entire world has become so destabilized. America is a terrorist state and the US military machine is the single biggest threat to human survival. Stopping the US at all costs is the most important thing that we can do to protect the biological experiment of the current ecosystem upon which we depend.

                The only reason I am considering voting for Trump in the fall (compared to the handful of reasons why I am considering Harris) is that four more years of chaos may finally destroy the American War Machine and the disaster that is American foreign policy.

                Four more years of Trump directly puts my life in danger, but if it leads to this country self-destructing I’m personally willing to make that sacrifice. Anything to cripple our criminal war machine. What good are our rights and liberties if the depend on a war machine that is willing to risk the habitability of our planet? If America collapses, with it will fall the major fuel of the arms race. If the leopards have to eat my face for my country to finally get put in its place, I’ll proudly try to pet the kitty.

                Ideally, I want America to be a functional democracy that respects and promotes civil rights and liberties around the globe. I have never had the option to vote for such an America. In my lifetime I have never seen America take actions that imply that these are the values of our government. The options are to vote for the competent criminal who will directly and purposefully undermine the habitability of our planet, or the incompetent one who may cause more damage in the short-term due to his bumbling but may be better in the long run by removing America’s destructive influence on the world’s stage as we turn inwards to fight a civil war. Maybe a civil war will cause us to reassert what we claim are our values, and I’ll finally live in a country I can respect,

                I’m pretty genuinely torn in this election, because I’m willing to sacrifice my personal safety for what I see as a net positive in the world in the long run. I’d rather be hopeful that we have a path to fix America. I’d rather be hopeful that America could be a country that promotes democracy and civil liberties. America as it stands is not a democracy, and we have no liberty. America is dead. Do we keep voting for the parasites, or do we vote for the incinerator to protect others?

                • Hamartia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  But what if Trump and pals manage to stabilize their fascist state. You will never have another free election (Putin style instead of the propaganda of billionaires and theocrats). The whole world will be fucked and all on your coin toss.

                  It is for once too dangerous to leave to chance. You need to get Harris in, and Trump and the corrupt supreme justices in jail. THEN from the ground up build a new political party for the people and the planet.

                • That poll is about opinions on the US’s role, and says nothing about Israel.

                  It’s a poll about the US role in the ME w.r.t. Israel, the rest of the poll’s questions were also about Israel, this was just the question that I figured best represents how people feel about Biden’s handling of it so far.

                  The only reason I am considering voting for Trump in the fall (compared to the handful of reasons why I am considering Harris) is that four more years of chaos may finally destroy the American War Machine and the disaster that is American foreign policy.

                  Are you sure about that? Last time Trump was president we got Russia gearing up for an invasion of Ukraine and China posturing regarding an invasion of Taiwan as well. Neither of these conflicts have been or would be beneficial to humanity as a whole. It’s destroyed the ecosystem in Ukraine for example.

                  And suppose Trump does turn isolationist instead of going to war with Iran like he’s been trying to do. Do you think the resulting power vacuum will lead American voters to believe that going isolationist was beneficial? We saw the opposite in 2020 happen, where people wanted the US to return to the world stage by electing Biden.

                  Ideally, I want America to be a functional democracy that respects and promotes civil rights and liberties around the globe. […] Maybe a civil war will cause us to reassert what we claim are our values, and I’ll finally live in a country I can respect,

                  Have you considered that you might end up on the losing side? Republicans have always been war hawks. Them fully cementing their power through Trump could very well lead to an even more active US war machine. Trump won’t be around forever, he’s old and these days the target of assassination attempts.

                  Accelerationism has been tried in the past. It has never ended well. I urge you to really reflect on what it truly means if your envisioned scenario were to happen. I urge you to reflect on the many, many things that have to happen in order to end up somewhere better. And please, consider what happens if you’re wrong about what electing Trump will lead to.

                  I live in a country that’s been under the yolk of another whose population thought like you do, that maybe making things worse will make things better. It led to the worst environmental disaster we’ve ever known, caused the deaths of millions and led to the birth of the US war machine. The scars are still visible today.

                  I sympathize with you though. The US is in a shit place electorally speaking. Organizing for electoral reform is probably the best shot at fixing things, but that takes incredible time, effort and money to get through. I can see why that feels hopeless. But personally, I find it a more honorable cause. Endangering yourself and many others is in my opinion deeply irresponsible.

                • 0x0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You’re a weird American and i say that as a compliment. I hope there are more like you.

                  Please chose the lesser evil in November.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes and Harris complicity in continuing the genocide in Gaza, the ethnic cleansing in the Westbank and now the invasion of Lebanon will be the greatest risk for her election. But they would rather hand over the US to Trump on a silver plate, than to stop killing Arabs.

    • infinitevalence@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      110
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Also just a little slow to come around to reality like always.

      Edit… Down vote all you want I’m still a big Bernie fan but the whole US government has been on the wrong side of this war from the beginning. We treat Palestinian lives just like black and brown lives at home like they didn’t matter.

      Lastly Hamas is not Palestinian I can support Palestinians and condemn Hamas.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        90
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        He was criticizing the response since the beginning?

        Frankly I was initially supporting them, as I am against Hamas but Israel lost the objective, didn’t destroy Hamas and didn’t get hostages out. So what was all that for?

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          Frankly I was initially supporting them,

          Must be new to the long history of apartheid, genocidal, capitalist project that is “Israel”…

        • 0x0
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          So what was all that for?

          Zionists will only stop when they eradicate all Palestinians, because they believe they have a god-given right to be there. For them this is business as usual.

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            what you said, even if were to be true, does not contradict what I said so your comment does not make any sense

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        And doing so in a way that is going to accomplish almost nothing while antagonizing and alienating the people who would let him otherwise get positive legislature passed.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    218
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    For those who don’t know (there are probably a few) Bernie is Jewish, and his opinions better reflect the rest of us Jews than the crazies on the right (and left) and in Israel. I don’t have stats, but every American Jew I’ve talked to about this has been morally outraged and frankly mortified by Israel’s actions. We understand how it looks to the rest of the world. Don’t let the antisemitism arguments (usually pushed by Christians btw) fool you. Bernie is on the right side of this issue, as usual.

    • ALQ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fellow American Jew here. Very much agreed. Israel doesn’t represent us, even if it tries to say it does.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        86
        ·
        2 months ago

        Texan Jew here. I’m surrounded by a sea of monsters.

        I’ve made documentaries, art projects, and memorials for family members who were in the Holocaust. A few survived (literally, like, 3 of them), but multitudes more were killed. My family and community has praised me for my passionate interest and attempts to teach younger generations the dangers of complacency and compartmentalizing. One of my relatives even helped pass a law adding Holocaust Remembrance Week as part of the curriculum for every grade level in Texas.

        We’ve seen this kind of destruction before, we’ve lived this oppression and violence before. We have discussed how our family might have changed had over 90% of them not been killed.

        HOW THE FUCK IS MY FAMILY AND COMMUNITY OKAY WITH ANOTHER GENOCIDE???

        The self-delusion, what-abouts, stereotypes, and straight-up racist insults.

        “They’d kill us if given the opportunity”
        YOU’RE ALREADY KILLING THEM

        “These are really bad, violent people”
        THEY ARE CHILDREN AND CIVILIANS AND THEY ARE DYING

        “It’s not comparable to the Holocaust. Germany killed 6 million…”

        THAT’S YOUR FUCKING CUTOFF???

        WE GOTTA WAIT FOR 6 MILLION PEOPLE TO DIE BEFORE WE CAN EMPATHIZE WITH VICTIMS OF GENOCIDE??? Where was this sense of calm and nonchalance when Nazis were posting propaganda around town? How many of your kids need to be dismembered and vaporized before you say “this is more than upsetting, this is WRONG”??!

        I swear, I’m probably less than a month away from hearing someone I once respected say “the Palestinian cries out in pain as they hit you.”

        • ALQ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          2 months ago

          Omfg I feel you so hard on this with a few people, but am fortunate to not be in Texas.

          “Never again,” my ass. Those types of people mean only “never again for me and mine.” Genocide is genocide is genocide, regardless of whether we’re the victim or not.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            2 months ago

            Israel learned the wrong lesson from the Holocaust. They decided that the next time somebody gets stepped on, they’re going to be the boot, not the bug.

            • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              There are always amoral opportunists. Unfortunately, they are pulling the strings in Israel right now.

              If good people don’t vote in the US in November, we will be no better.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 months ago

          “It’s not comparable to the Holocaust. Germany killed 6 million…”

          There are fewer than 6 million people in all of Palestine. If that’s their cutoff, they can eradicate everyone and “it still wouldn’t be as bad.” That’s probably their thought process.

        • katharta@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          It wasn’t OK when the Egyptians and Germans did it to the Jews, and it’s not OK when the Jews are doing it to others too.

          Thank you for sharing your experience.

          • 0x0
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Beau of the fifth column (now it’s Belle on cam) is from the south and quite the interesting critter.

            • Revan343@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t discount there being good people in Texas or elsewhere in the south, I just know there are a whole lot of bad people as well, who tend to be more likely to hold political power.

              If you like hip-hop, listen to Anne Braden by Flobots

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          “It’s not comparable to the Holocaust. Germany killed 6 million…”

          There are fewer than 6 million people in all of Palestine. If that’s their cutoff, they can eradicate everyone and “it still wouldn’t be as bad.” That’s probably their thought process.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        Another American Jew chiming in. Israel has never represented me. I’m from Indiana. I have far more in common with a Palestinian-American from Tuscon, Arizona than I do any Jew in Haifa.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          no, you MUST identify with the vision of a Jewish ethnostate, it is after all supposed to be your ethnostate… you know, the one whose existence is, for a lot of people, literally justified by the 14 words (but replace white with Jewish)? /s.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        i sorta inferred this about american jews because doesn’t israel give economic incentives to jewish people moving to israel? so the fact that you don’t live in israel says something

    • UmeU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s the Christian zionists here in the US that support this genocide because they think it will help expedite the end of the world

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This makes sense, because this isn’t an Israeli or Jewish endeavor. It’s Benjamin Netanyahu desperately provoking a war to maintain his grip on power, because as soon as he’s out of power he will have to be held accountable for his many crimes. Bibi would rather die in office than face that. It’s truly regrettable that his actions have soured the entire world’s opinion on Israel, but here we are.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Netanyahu is to blame for making the situation worse, and for actively working against a ceasefire, but I think it’s important to point out that the majority of Israelis appear to support his actions in Gaza. It’s definitely an Israeli issue and a Netanyahu issue.

      • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        The state of Israel in its inception was colonisation, apartheid, massacre, white supremacy, and genocide. Netanyahu is certainly a monster. But look at the rest of his cabinet. Listen to an interview with Israeli citizens even before October 7th in the way they speak about Palestinians and Arabs.

        Israel is thoroughly and consistently sick from beginning to end, top to bottom. It’s a depraved machine of terror that runs on the blood of innocent people.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It seems to me they’re a country built on 19th century white colonialist values (Jewish white colonialism is no better than the once much more common Christian kind) and which has never evolved from those values but rather kept going until reaching the natural conclusion: Genocide.

          (It’s not by chance that Israelis keep claiming that they have “Western Values” - it’s really just a politically correct way of saying “white values”)

          Israel is similar to South-Africa, except that they were never forced to stop and just kept doubling down on the racism and violent oppression of the ethnicity they victimize.

          I blame mainly the US and Germany for the continued support of Israel’s white colonialism and it’s natural outcome of Genocide.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I realize this is very sensitive issue and things have likely changed since april, but the last time I saw this polled Jewish Americans support Israel’s response to Oct.7 about 62%, 33% oppose

      Granted, since april and just off the top of my head, Israel has bombed a number of Gaza refugee camps, killed the Hamas negotiator, conducted two terror attacks against Lebanon, and now is talking about sending ground troops in across the border,… so… yea maybe things have changed

      But im glad to have Sanders pushing for this though, I think it carries more weight coming from him.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ugh that’s shameful, and super disappointing. But thanks, I hadn’t seen a poll on American Jews as recent as April so I’d bet those numbers haven’t changed much. Seems the Jews I’m around have a very different relationship with Israel than the majority.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’ll hazard a guess that your circle is one mainly of highly educated city folk.

          Quite independently of Religion, Education and one’s level of exposure to all sorts of people and complex social environments (which normally comes with big city life) seem to be the biggest deciding factors about people having or not “traditional values” (read: conservative) and the excessive and blind tribalism that makes them more likely to find excuses to support Genocide along ethnic lines “when our side does it”.

      • 0x0
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The irony is that what they’re doing is holocaust.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fun fact: Sanders consistently out-performed Hillary in head-to-head matchups against Trump.

      The same establishment that derailed Sanders and propped Hillary up were the same ones trying to force Biden down our throats while castigating any dissent.*

      *I know the progressives supported Biden until the end, but this was purely a strategic reason where if anything, their calls for Biden to step aside might’ve had the opposite effect.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Excuse me, we had to go with the obvious choice that would win /s

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        I won a porterhouse from a steakhouse over Hilary losing.

        I’d rather I hadn’t won. The bet was made in primary season, and that Hilary would get the nomination and lose the election. (There was a second part that said if Bernie won the nomination he’d be POTUS)

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d eat a hundred well-done steaks from Denny’s topped with ketchup if it meant we didn’t have to deal with Trump again.

      • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m in tinfoil hat territory, but it’s logical that Hillary was promised the Sec State position and superdelegate support for conceding to Obama and not making it a convention fight. It explains why the r’s only attacked her for 8 years outside Obama, they knew they didn’t have to attack any other potential candidate.

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think that’s tinfoil hat at all. I mean it seems like a very logical explanation and the same thoughts I had when I was watching it happen.

          I still remember when Hillary went to Obama before conceding and most were speculating it was going to be about a cabinet position and her running after Obama did.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bernie is always on top of these things, and you have to respect him for that.

    Polls have consistently found that the majority of the public supports an end to Israel’s genocide; a poll by the Institute for Global Affairs released this week found, for instance, that a majority of Americans think the U.S. should stop supporting Israel or make support contingent on Israeli officials’ agreement to a ceasefire deal. This includes nearly 80 percent of Democrats.

    Even though 80% of Democrats are for this kind of bill watch, the majority of Congress vote against it, including the Democrats.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      67
      ·
      2 months ago

      Speak for yourself. I don’t love nor idolize any politician.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        yeah I don’t understand why anyone would just comment “Mac loves and idolizes Bernie” unprompted. what a dingus

      • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Big brained independent thinker over here independently thunking away. What kinda ideas will they come up with? None, but he will make it clear he doesn’t like yours. Cause if he did then he wouldn’t be independent anymore!

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I just think idolizing politicians (and people in general (like celebrity worship)) is gross and is how we got to where we’re at.

          Sorry i offended you.

      • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You realize love can also mean you strongly like it, right? I love pizza and wings. So what’s exactly going though your mind when I take it home?

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Apparently “i love you” is the same as “i love pizza”.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is still an action of the “we want to influence Israel, but keep them as our ally” kind.

      That doesn’t work. To make them listen, you must be willing to actually let them die. To drop them under the bus.

      Same goes for Turkey, Russia, Pakistan.

      Well, geopolitics make this a dangerous approach, but one should remember always than anything short of that readiness is not leverage.

      So what they should be voting on is this AND dissolving the alliance. Of course one shouldn’t make threats of clearly hostile action while still allied, this bites long-term.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Its pretty fucked up how law seems to mean less and less nowdays. to think there even needs to be such vote about america sending weapons to country breaking international laws and doing terrorist shit.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      when exactly did you feel like international law meant something, and what events made you feel so? genuinely would like to know

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Growing up in America there’s definitely an initial feeling of “law and order” ruling many of America’s past with interfering in other countries affairs, eventually you learn about the fucked up shit if you actually start looking though lol.

        I remember I did a presentation in middle school about Operation Paperclip and most of the class thought I was making it up lol.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          L&O, America, what bullshit.

          now don’t get me wrong, better than nations like Russia for sure, but there is a reason most lawful-anything carters get called out as lawful stupid in DnD, it just doesn’t work

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I thought it meant something, as they bothered to even pretend there is international law by having one in first place.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        But it isn’t even international law, these are domestic laws forbidding sending weapons to nations that interfere with US humanitarian aid that have been flouted repeatedly and with the barest semblance of an excuse made. I can see them not paying attention to UN “laws” but this isnt the same thing.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          you seem to misunderstand what a sovereign is, you see the US government, as being the only sovereign entity in the US can literally do whatever it wants. who’s going to stop them? a handful of militia men?

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s wild to me that Americans are suddenly playing moral police on this. America sells weapons to just about every dictatorship or oppressive government, to this day. Including Saudis, the ones who blew up the trade center. It seems hypocritical how hard Sanders and others are going, demanding the stop of weapons sales to just Israel. Why not the rest of the world?

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Have to start somewhere, our military industrial complex isn’t going to be stopped all at once. And the genociders are the most obvious evil at the moment.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We’re not the moral police. There are many Americans who are diehard pro-genocide. There are others that are implicitly pro-genocide. They just don’t hang out on Lemmy. Also, our media is focused on Israel right now. Most Americans don’t know what our military is doing elsewhere in the world and the media doesn’t cover it. It’s hard for a populist politician to take a stand against our military industrial complex when the population doesn’t know what that Complex is doing. That industry fights back.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    The resolutions are not likely to pass; even if they did pass the heavily pro-Israel Congress, they would likely be vetoed by President Joe Biden, who has been insistent on sending weapons to Israel with no strings attached.

    Yeah, this is an absolute shame. He tried doing something similar shortly after the genocide had started, but everyone else currently in power just shut him down almost unanimously.

    If politics and getting into power wasn’t 90% based on your wealth and connections, maybe US could have more people like Bernie trying to actually do good rather than trying to enrich or empower themselves.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      AIPAC buying American politicians to ensure support for the war continues. Pretty fucked that a foreign nation state can buy US policies like this. Honestly, I’m surprised it doesn’t happen more often, and more brazenly - it is “legal” after all.

    • dgmib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they’re forced to vote on it, at least we’ll know which politicians have a spine and which have a padded wallet.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      File that one behind the what-if of a Gore Presidency. We keep missing the alternate timelines we should have taken. Here’s hoping we don’t screw up once again.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Imagine a back-to-back two term each Gore then Bernie presidency. We’d be living in a utopia, and I’m not even American

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m glad he’s giving me a chance to have yet another demonstration of how shitty our country is. Can’t wait to see this fail miserably and anyone who votes for it lose their re-election.

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Billions of dollars and weapons to Urkaine! Yes!

    Billions of dollars and weapons to Israel! NO!!!

    LOL