Judge faces lawsuit after forcing student to put on jail garments and handcuffs and enter isolated holding cell

A Detroit judge who briefly detained a teenage girl who fell asleep in his courtroom during a school field trip to learn about the justice system was demoted to presiding over traffic court as he faces a federal lawsuit.

Judge Kenneth King was moved to the state court’s traffic division after the incident on 13 August. King was temporarily removed from the bench as he completed mandatory training following his actions.

“We appreciate his efforts in preparing for this role, and wish him success as he transitions into this new responsibility,” said the chief judge, William McConico, in a statement.

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The bigger picture here is that he had an active YouTube livestream with roughly a 1000 fans that he used to interact with while in cases over the last few years. He even repositioned the cameras for them while he was harrasing that poor girl.

    Its clear that his treatment of her was not only an ego trip, but one done for views.

    • embed_me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Hmm the world has already turned more dystopian than I had assumed

  • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 month ago

    King is facing a federal lawsuit filed by Eva Goodman, 15, and her mother, Latoreya Till, after Goodman was forced to put on jail garments, handcuffed and put in an isolated holding cell during an educational trip to King’s courtroom.

    The trip certainly was educational, though probably not in the way the school intended.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      But perhaps exactly what was (unfortunately) needed;

      Don’t assume institutions and those in power or authority are anything more than fallible efforts. Ever.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ironically the judge got himself an educatin’ too didn’t he. Fuck around power tripping and find out.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I was so, so waiting for consequences to finally reach this asshole. Reminder that this teenage student and her family *were experiencing homelessness and was apparently exhausted trying to meet all her responsibilities! She needed an advocate, not a bully. This is the type of person that demands respect from you, while not valuing you as a human, beyond considering what you can do for him. I hope he endures excruciating traffic cases until he is removed from the bench…

    EDIT: Changed to people-first language.

    • lazyViking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      She was homeless, not ✨ unhoused ✨. Stop trying to minimise other people’s suffering

      • nemno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I sure everyone understood what was meant by that. Stop creating an issue over nothing.

        • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          People can call them whatever they want. You can call them homeless, unhoused, unsheltered, houseless, displaced, vagrant, destitute, loiterers, whatever language helps you talk about homelessness in a way that actually helps people and doesn’t obfuscate the issue.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Unhoused” is callous and “homeless” is not?

        While others are downvoting you for missing the point (possibly because I was already attempting to consider them with empathy and dignity), I probably should have actually said “person experiencing homelessness”, and have edited it as such.

        In 2020, an entry on homelessness was added to The Associated Press Stylebook noting how “Homeless is generally acceptable as an adjective to describe people without a fixed residence” and that reporters should use person-first language to "avoid the dehumanizing collective noun the homeless, instead using constructions like homeless people, people without housing or people without homes.”

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People-first_language

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        People who are unhoused are not always homeless. Many unhoused people have homes in tents, camps, etc.

        The term homeless is often used to obscure these homes so that residents can be attacked, dispossessed, encaged, etc.

    • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      He’s an elected judge. I don’t know Michigan’s laws but there might not be much more that can be done by the court administration themselves. I personally also took Chief Judge McConico’s statement as a tactful ‘fuck you’ to Judge King.

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dude had a fucking power boner.

    He saw a tired teenager who was bothering nobody as an opportunity to wave his dick around.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If I was the family of this girl I’d want to sure this dude so hard he’d end up living in a box under a bridge. Then go find him and take away his box.

    • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ya, I agree that they should 100% get some sort of monetary compensation for this. The issue is that the judge has a lot of money and can get a much better lawyer than them. They are already close to being homeless so I don’t imagine they can afford a good lawyer, there may be 1 or 2 who would take the case Pro Bono but I’m betting most would offer to do it for 40% of the winnings.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        40% of the winnings is a bargain. The difference in good lawyers is both the time spend on your case, and how much they win.

        That 60% wouldn’t be gotten without the lawyer.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    On a side article about her suing this asshole, there is the following quote:

    Eventually, King asked Goodman’s peers by a show of hands to indicate whether he should let her go or send her to jail. Amid nervous laughter, most agreed he should show leniency, according to the video, which has since been removed from YouTube.

    What the actual frack? How do people like this become a judge?

    The lawsuit lists a litany of alleged violations of constitutional rights. That includes unreasonable search and seizures, being detained without due process, being compelled to provide evidence against herself, not getting the chance to hire a lawyer of her choosing and protection from “unusual punishment.”

    Yeah, this. When you don’t even know the basic laws that you’re supposed to uphold, how the frack do you become a judge?