• dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m also bothered by very detailed QR codes. Milk cartons in my country had a QR-code for their website. It would be a ~10 letter url, maybe with a short path. But for some reason, the QR code was extremely detailed, as if it contained several kilobytes of data. I’m not sure if there were a large number of tracking-related parameters in the url, but it was very obviously unreasonably large.

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Strongly agree on this one. Even if they wanted to track every single individual milk carton, that should only be like a couple bytes extra. Overly complex QR codes look ugly and are harder to scan

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The complexity is likely a product of redundancy and error correction in the QR code rather than making it unique. You begin to run into issues with camera resolution and whatnot, but in theory those codes are likely more reliable.

          • Noxy@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            yeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max

            or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason

              Ideally you should use a short URL that redirects to the full URL. The tracking parameters should be on the long URL, not the short one.