• Blackbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What the hell are you talking about? Did you even read the endorsement? It doesn’t even mention Bush.

    • newfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What was McCains stance on all of the above?

      Pining for the party of Bush is pining for evil and diminished living standards

      • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        None of that has anything to do with Kamala Harris. Again, what the hell are you talking about? That paragraph is addressing CONSERVATIVES.

        • newfie@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re saying Kamala will help restore the GOP to the party of Bush and McCain. That is a terrible thing to admit. The neoconservatives are monsters who harmed the country, to say nothing of the innocents abroad who were tortured and murdered

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Where the eff is this BS from? They clearly said if you cut off the toxic poisoned head spewing hate and venom, the Republican Party can rebuild around ideas, policy, maybe even around morality (doubt). If you’re a conservative, that ought to be a good thing. If you’re pro-democracy, the renewal of two sane choices battling for ideas ought to be a good thing.

            I’m sure I also would disagree with those ideas, but I welcome the competition, I welcome the possibility of respecting g our national leaders.

            All I can say is that when Mitt Romney talks family values, he means actual family values. When Ronald Reagan said he’d trickle down on you, you could smell the urine. When Ross Perot talked about corporatism, he meant it

            • newfie@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              If you’re pro-democracy, the renewal of two sane choices battling for ideas ought to be a good thing.

              I’m sure I also would disagree with those ideas, but I welcome the competition, I welcome the possibility of respecting g our national leaders.

              If you’re pro democracy then the restoration of the pre Trump GOP is a terrible thing. They were always this bad on policy, if not worse re: Iraq. It’s just now Trump has taken the mask off.

              It is in the interest of the American people for the GOP to permanently stay Trumpist, or get even more extreme. They can’t win national elections when they are like this. Whereas the neocons and the Bushes are capable of winning. And they’re drastically more effective and competent and harmful than Trump

              If Kamala does anything to restore the GOP then she is a fool. Liz Cheney is competent which makes her more dangerous than Trump

              “Welcoming the competition” is insanely out of touch. This isn’t a game. This isn’t a show. This is about power and how the American people are treated. We have terrible standards of living for a first world country. The GOP would make it even worse. Doing anything to strengthen them needs to be opposed. Otherwise we will never have the quality of life of Denmark. And if thats the case then every American with a brain should just emigrate to Scandinavia now