Oh it’s not about the left-wing criticism. Criticism is a part of the process. It’s expected, and it’s warranted. What it IS about… is the absolute absence of right-wing criticism.
See you can only whine about the stubbed toe and ignore the cancer for so long before people begin to wonder if you’re the cancer.
Oh, this might just be a translation issue, see when I said “left wing criticism” I mean, criticism coming from the left wing directed towards things that are to the right.
You understand that the horizon of all political opinion doesn’t terminate with the democratic party?
If I was to criticize the republicans it would still be a left wing critique, as they are to my right, just more so than the democrats.
Riiiiiiiight. Hilarious take. And how was this a translation issue exactly? You’re moving goalposts. That’s not a translation issue. That’s a bad-faith tactic to distract.
You understand that the horizon of all political opinion doesn’t terminate with the democratic party, right? 😬
taking your analogy- what if the stubbed toe is gangrenous? that will kill you way faster than cancer. My point is that going along with genocide like this is actually to blame for this election not being a slam dunk against the most unlikeable person in history
See… there you go moving the goalposts. If the stubbed toe was gangrenous, I’d have said “gangrenous stubbed toe.” It’s not. Therefore we aren’t going to debate as if it is.
And I’m not going to argue with whatever other ‘what if’ scenario you come up with here. The point is. I think you need a new bit. I get your commitment to this one, and it’s impressive, but this one isn’t working.
Now I’m done here. I said what I felt needed be said and can tell from your comment history that you aren’t going to let this go- so by all means….
You’re moving goalposts. That’s not a translation issue. That’s a bad-faith tactic to distract.
you said:
Oh it’s not about the left-wing criticism. Criticism is a part of the process. It’s expected, and it’s warranted. What it IS about… is the absolute absence of right-wing criticism.
Why would I be producing right wing criticism of the republicans? it makes no sense.
That’s why I said it must be some translation issue like you meant to say there’s no criticism of the right wing. Which is untrue, like for one democrats are right wing, and I criticize them, but I also don’t have much productive to say about them beyond that we should empty our prisons and fill them up with republicans, but only to re-educate them, like force them to break rocks and fill up their pristine truck beds with literally anything for once.
I don’t think anyone is buying it. Maybe try a different tactic?
This kind of comment is pointless
Amazing that you showed up to respond with something equally pointless in a day old thread that only became active in the past half hour.
I don’t argue with sock puppets either.
tactic? idk what to tell you bud, I’m just a girl in the world venting on lemmy.
And you can do whenever you’d like. I am not obligated to believe you.
You clearly wouldn’t be able to process a left wing criticism if it smacked you in the face. I have nothing to prove to you.
Oh it’s not about the left-wing criticism. Criticism is a part of the process. It’s expected, and it’s warranted. What it IS about… is the absolute absence of right-wing criticism.
See you can only whine about the stubbed toe and ignore the cancer for so long before people begin to wonder if you’re the cancer.
Oh, this might just be a translation issue, see when I said “left wing criticism” I mean, criticism coming from the left wing directed towards things that are to the right.
You understand that the horizon of all political opinion doesn’t terminate with the democratic party?
If I was to criticize the republicans it would still be a left wing critique, as they are to my right, just more so than the democrats.
Riiiiiiiight. Hilarious take. And how was this a translation issue exactly? You’re moving goalposts. That’s not a translation issue. That’s a bad-faith tactic to distract.
You understand that the horizon of all political opinion doesn’t terminate with the democratic party, right? 😬
taking your analogy- what if the stubbed toe is gangrenous? that will kill you way faster than cancer. My point is that going along with genocide like this is actually to blame for this election not being a slam dunk against the most unlikeable person in history
See… there you go moving the goalposts. If the stubbed toe was gangrenous, I’d have said “gangrenous stubbed toe.” It’s not. Therefore we aren’t going to debate as if it is.
And I’m not going to argue with whatever other ‘what if’ scenario you come up with here. The point is. I think you need a new bit. I get your commitment to this one, and it’s impressive, but this one isn’t working.
Now I’m done here. I said what I felt needed be said and can tell from your comment history that you aren’t going to let this go- so by all means….
Enjoy the last word. Make it a good’n!
you said:
Why would I be producing right wing criticism of the republicans? it makes no sense.
That’s why I said it must be some translation issue like you meant to say there’s no criticism of the right wing. Which is untrue, like for one democrats are right wing, and I criticize them, but I also don’t have much productive to say about them beyond that we should empty our prisons and fill them up with republicans, but only to re-educate them, like force them to break rocks and fill up their pristine truck beds with literally anything for once.
Diva already explained her lack of right wing criticism.
She’s so far from right wing that her criticism would be fruitless. She criticizes the Democratic party to have a place for her criticism to land.
And the white-knight sock puppet swoops in for the rescue.
It’s exhausting isn’t it? The endless stream of bullshit attacks on your voice. Refusing to address the topic
I try not to let it get to me, even if it can feel like getting shouted down its good exposure