• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is it six different perspectives or is it one perspective by six conglomerates that are colluding?

      • Twista713@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is it really those 6 billionaires opinions in every one of the stories their media presents every day? Seems like a stretch. I could see them imprinting their biases and blocking stories that they don’t want out, but colluding to control the narrative gives them too much credit I think. I’m lucky enough to have some decent independent journalism in my area, but I would love if there was more!

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          imprinting their biases and blocking stories that they don’t want out

          That’s it. That’s all they need to do to influence a country or population at the scale that billionaires operate at. They all have very similar opinions and preferences (otherwise they wouldn’t be billionaires).

          That so e people think that a publicly funded editorially independent press is somehow worse that this is maddening.

          It’s also not a zero sum game. We can have both, yet somehow some people think it’s one or the other.

          • Twista713@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I hear you. And I agree, I would love more independently edited press out there. PBS and NPR seem under attack regularly by the right, but they do a pretty good job of being unbiased overall.