According to recent user reports, uBlock Origin is quickly disappearing from the Chrome Web Store. The official page for the ad-blocking extension now states that it is unavailable because it doesn’t comply with Chrome’s “best practices” for add-ons. However, we can confirm that the page is still accessible from our EU Windows client.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Problem solved, except for the sites that still refuse to work properly with established web standards.

      for most of these, using an extension to pretend you are using chrome fixes the “problem”

    • endofline@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      yes, i use mostly ff but still i keep chrome. Maybe ill install brave or vivaldii for the chrome engine purpose only

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I like Vivaldi. Best of both worlds: no Google bullshit, like Firefox, combined with the compatibility of WebKit.

    • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Man… I switched a while back. Shits wild how many sites don’t work correctly

      Edit: my wife sends me tiktok videos which doesn’t work and then a random smattering of redirects.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have not really found any…

        But also, if you find sites that won’t work in Firefox, keep using them with Firefox and get others to do the same, then start complaining to the company running the site.

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I did email one site that had a message that it only worked with chrome, I said that switching my user agent fixed the “issue” and the site seemed to work with no issues on FF.

          A few months later, no more warning.

        • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I edited my initial comment.

          But it’s tiktok that my wife sends me and redirects. Which in absolutely not going to complain to tiktok because fuck that noise. IDC enough about that mess.

          The redirects are annoying… But I just work around that in most cases

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve only found a couple of sites that don’t work. They need the Web Serial API, which the Firefox devs don’t want to implement.

        • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          Microsoft Teams comes up with an unknown error on Firefox, which gets magically fixed when changing user agent…

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Which ones? I’ve used Firefox and Vivaldi (which is Chromium-based) interchangeably for the last couple of years, and I can’t remember noticing any difference in their ability to handle sites. The main difference I’ve noticed is that Firefox renders fonts more nicely in Linux.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Soon, users will have to choose between accepting Chrome’s inferior ad-blocking technology or switching to a different browser.

    Doesn’t seem like a terribly difficult choice. Firefox it is.

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think it does, but only blocks competing advertisers

        (Note: I actually have no clue if they do and I’m talking out my ass; that said, I would absolutely not be surprised one bit if they did exactly that)

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve already switched to Firefox. It makes me a little sad that I moved to chrome in the first place. Back then google seemed to care about improving the web experience and moving to open standards. Now they are so dominant, it’s the opposite. Its the death of an idealistic internet.

  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    So THIS is why all the Firefox hit pieces have been surfacing recently….

    Suddenly the picture becomes clearer lol.

    I’m not surprised, they have been threatening this for awhile, put the timing of the hit pieces, and then this…… answers a lot of questions

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be fair, Mozilla is making some choices regarding Firefox that are pretty controversial; most of us don’t like many of the decisions being made and have legitimate frustrations.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure, and that’s meaningful, but the problem is that many articles are getting major details and entire concepts wrong and publishing statements that are so inaccurate that it feels like bullshit.

        Like the advertising counter is nowhere near how it’s been represented over and over in various unknown blogs.

        Very much has the feel of a FUD campaign

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No they don’t. When chrome first came out, every tech enthusiast and tech journalist praised it and encouraged every tech person to use it and to get their families to use it. Now millions of families still use Chrome and they don’t deserve to suffer.

      Let’s help all our loved ones move to a better browser and a better internet experience.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Using chrome is the same as not respecting human rights on the web, because it actively works against our best interests with tracking and spying.

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Best to switch to Firefox anyways, or even better privacy enhanced LibreWolf

    This project is a custom and independent version of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy, security and user freedom. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM.

  • scsi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    (x-posted comment) There’s a MV3 alternate (same dev!) “uBlock Origin Lite” which this article completely misses out on mentioning: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh

    There are certain websites and tools which need chrome/chromium making it a necessary evil; for example there’s a new trend in firmware flashing of devices like ESP32 boards and HAM/GMRS radios which are web based and use Chrome tech. This new MV3 fork isn’t as good as the original but it’s better than nothing and does stop some ad trash.