• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yeah , it’s almost as if you have to rally the troops and get out the vote in every single election.

    FDR’s New Deal held together for decades, until Ronald Reagan got in.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Lmao, it’s literally all vibes

      “people stop wanting progressive policies because we stop pushing for them” is a take that’s completely divorced from physical reality. You have to be completely blind to how people’s material and cultural reality relate to each other if you’re to believe this.

      FDR’s New Deal held together for decades, until Ronald Reagan got in.

      If it wasn’t Reagan, it would have been another reactionary politician. Looking at history as if individual men/women dictate our reality as if in a decontextualized vacuum is maddeningly idiotic. Reagan represented a popular movement of reactionary conservatism - he didn’t invent it out of whole-cloth. There has never been a social-democratic government that hasn’t eventually been privatized or been subject to increasing austerity measures, and that pattern can be studied and rationalized as a dialectic.