Senior Democrats in US cities are preparing to defend their communities in the event of Donald Trump’s return to the White House after the former president has repeated threats that he would use presidential powers to seize control of major urban centers.

Trump has proposed deploying the military inside major cities largely run by Democrats to deal with protesters or to crush criminal gangs. He has threatened to dispatch large numbers of federal immigration agents to carry out mass deportations of undocumented people in so-called “sanctuary” cities.

He also aims to obliterate the progressive criminal justice policies of left-leaning prosecutors.

“In cities where there has been a complete breakdown of law and order … I will not hesitate to send in federal assets including the national guard until safety is restored,” Trump says in the campaign platform for his bid to become the 47th US president, Agenda47.

Trump provoked uproar earlier this week when he called for US armed forces to be deployed against his political rivals – “the enemy within” – on election day next month. But his plans to use national guard troops and military personnel as a means to attack those he sees as his opponents go much wider than that, spanning entire cities with Democratic leadership.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If Trump loses the elections, US cities at risk of stochastic violence and domestic terrorism. It’s not like Harris winning would suddenly make half the country go, “my bad, you’re right.”

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    US military personnel pledge an oath to protect the US Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies and that includes the Commander-in-Chief.

  • ThatOneKrazyKaptain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    With the current info on Undecideds, it’s lining up mostly with what I guessed based on what we knew about the locked in voters barring another polling disaster rendering all the data moot. Around 60% of the recent undecideds have broke for Harris, but the bulk of Undecideds who committed earlier broke for Trump (52-48) which is a larger number. These two average out to basically 50-50 on the whole. Undecideds went massively for Trump both previous elections so I don’t foresee Harris breaking 50%ish, that’s already a big gain.

    This is relevant because the final locked in scores at the rate things are trending are going to be something like 47.5 - 49 give or take a half a point by election day. Not all of the 3-4 points left are going to either them, at least one, maybe 2 are going for Third Parties, which unlike in past years are way more left leaning than normal thanks mostly to RFK Jr and Libertarian infighting. Harris is trending in the right direction, but that 3rd party shift absorbs some of that. A final 50/50 call between what’s left leaves maybe a 2 point difference final result depending on exactly how well third parties do. 48-50 or so. That’s a Hilary Clinton sized margin between Popular Vote and EC. Not a death sentence, this thing is cyclical, sometimes it favors one party or another (Democrats had a EC advantage in 2004 and 2008 and probably 2012) and sometimes it’s stronger. The effect is supposed to be much less this year, a Biden level margin of 4 points or even a 3 point lead is a safe Kamala win. Not so much 2 points, that’s up in the margins.

    If the polling is right, this is a dead heat election where Wisconsin and Michigan are going blue, Arizona Georgia and North Carolina going red, and Nevada and Pennsylvania are too close to call.

  • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    A military takeover of the cities would last about 20minutes, if that, it’s against the HOA rules.

    What happens when the wealthy home owners see their property values drop, because the army is on every corner, they’ll start calling their political reps.

    This is a childish fantasy, the highest real estate values are in cities, the wealthiest people have homes in cities. It is a fantasy of the Republic base, that tends not to live in large urban centers.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You know he means the downtown core, not the suburban white people who likely voted for him. But I gave you an upvote for the hilarity of an HOA council member telling the Proud Boys they aren’t allowed to setup there.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      So much suffering. That was so avoidable. I like that the point of movie isn’t which ideology wins. It’s that America isn’t immune, any civil war will be a very dirty affair that causes massive amounts of suffering so nobody should be rooting for that path.

  • Gumby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    But the constitution forbids the US military from operating within the borders of the US! Surely that’ll stop him from ever being able to do this! Right? Right???

    • GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not according to change is made by the DOD last month to 5240.01. It allows US military action on US soil, including lethal force.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The paper won’t stop him but the officer corps isn’t going to obey those orders without him converting it first. A process that historically takes years to complete and leaves a military a shadow of it’s former self.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It also forbids warrantless search and seizure of property and the president from receiving financial gifts from foreign governments. The courts have been filled with people who don’t care.

      • GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Congress didn’t care either. There were multiple constitutional violations that Trump committed while he was in office, but Pelosi never went for those. She went for small bullshit stuff that would result in what we got.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Possibly? One might be able to make the case for the National Guard, but maybe the average person won’t know/care about the difference when interacting with armed people in uniform.

      Aside from that, I’ve noticed other Lemmings bring up the fact that the Armed Forces in general are sworn to uphold the US Constitution. As an organization, they may disregard orders that are in conflict with this. Of course, that comes down to interpretation of any individual in command, so despite loud protest to the contrary I personally wouldn’t rely on that.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        As an organization, they may disregard orders that are in conflict with this. Of course, that comes down to interpretation of any individual in command, so despite loud protest to the contrary I personally wouldn’t rely on that.

        This is going to make me throw up a little, but I think the command leadership in recent years has really turned a heel on political alignment. And - hurk - I feel like they would do the honorable thing. You’re not wrong though, obviously the military attracts right wing shit heads who believe what they want. So I would imagine that there would be a breakdown of the command at lower levels in scant instances; but brigade, division, corps, and post commanders usually follow rigorous and strict guidelines. Values are a big deal. But brainworm has been feeding on dumb dumbs and it doesn’t appear to be starving any time soon.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, everyone has their own interpretation of the Constitution these days. They’ll “uphold” whatever version of the Constitution their own interpretation allows.

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          To be fair the constitution is deeply flawed and needed to evolve a lot more than it has to keep up with the progression of society. It needs to evolve or die, and with our current batch of compromised and etheically empty politicians I wouldnt trust them to alter it.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think the information is good, but they really need to actually talk about military leaders. It’s basically known that the military should not be operating within the US borders, with the exception of national guard, and that with strict limits. We know, because military leaders have told us, that they have discussed what they would do if Trump gave unconstitutional orders. But we don’t know the details, and we don’t know who has decided what. Of course it’s difficult for people to go public with hypothetical responses to that kind of blatant abuse of Presidential power. But it’s still something that needs to be mentioned.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hi former soldier here, I can offer some educated insight on this. What’s likely to happen in the very short term of such an order is the Joint Chiefs refuse it. Trump replaces them and the next set refuses it. This will happen a few more times before he gets someone willing to tell him yes, but they know the military under them isn’t going to respond. If Trump insists on this path he will likely try to directly order smaller units to do what he wants. Any unit that does will find it’s leaders immediately relieved of command by their superiors. If some small unit does find it’s way out into the public it’s likely a general will order the military police to go round them up on charges of deserting their post.

      It will be very messy and Authoritarians hate messy. Much more likely is they give the Proud Boys and the KKK uniforms and guns and call them soldiers, along with any federal agents he can recruit again. The actual military is going to be very resistant to shooting at Americans. We’ve spent the last 20 years sweating, bleeding, and even dying to protect Americans. Orders to go after Americans en masse, (instead of single Americans overseas on very good evidence they’re working with enemy militants), will require a complete change in ideology and essentially invalidates 20 years of effort on the part of the current force. I’ve seen guys refuse to moderate uniform standards for a command mandated fun event over this exact issue. (“My friends died wearing this uniform, I’ll be damned if I disrespect it like that”) I highly doubt Trump will change that in any kind of short order.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sounds like the evolution of all that would take years anyway… so it’s just a matter if he leaves office ever if elected again.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    mass deportations of undocumented people

    I feel like this is something that won’t really happen. Despite conservative rhetoric and posturing about closed borders, the reality is that major parts of our economy - like agriculture, meat packing, restaurants and construction - are utterly dependent on undocumented immigrant labor. Mass deportations would be insanely difficult to actually achieve, and would cause enormous economic upheaval, what with the fact that fucking food and housing are apparently important to people. Not to say that conservatives would really give a shit about that, but the people hiring all these undocumented workers and exploiting their cheap labor are generally conservative and wouldn’t want their cash cows disrupted.

    On the other hand, I didn’t think they would really do anything much about abortion either, since that’s such a major thing to fire their base up about. I should probably never underestimate their willingness to destroy the whole country in order to hurt what passes for the Left here.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I should probably never underestimate their willingness to destroy the whole country in order to hurt what passes for the Left here.

      I think we should take them at their word. They are insane enough to do a wide variety of terrible things and ruin the country. As far as their rich backers go, everyone thinks they can control the monster they’ve unleashed until it’s too late.

    • baru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I feel like this is something that won’t really happen.

      Similar things were said about abortion.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it’s the threat that is the point. Maybe the efforts won’t reach the critical “mass deportations” but the purpose is to make migrants scared.

  • atomicfox@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh, get a grip. Just add this to the list of many things Trump has said he would do that he never did. You guys do know he says stuff like this all the time just to play to his base, right? Well, nothing drives clicks like declaring that democracy will end.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wonder if you remember what happened on January 6th. A violent attempted insurrection, encouraged and orchestrated by Donald Trump. He is the kind of person that would do exactly what he says he wants to do. Do you want to repeat January 6th, so that you can be reminded of exactly what happened?

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s an incredibly stupid, naive and wreckless stance to take. You’re just going to wildly gamble on that? And the thing is, the only things he skipped doing something he said he’d do, was the “good” stuff he promised.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Correct, so maybe we could stop protesting Harris over Israel until AFTER the fucking election?

    Just saying, we should probably stop the genocide coming for us before we try to stop the one not in our backyard? I mean it’s going to be harder to get Israel to stop bombing Palestinian children and give humanitarian aide to said children while we’re lined up for Trump’s gas chambers

    signed, a transgender woman who don’t want to end up in a mass grave full of other AMAB individuals all of us wearing pink triangles!

    • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      signed, a transgender woman who don’t want to end up in a mass grave full of other AMAB individuals all of us wearing pink triangles!

      Innocent gazans and Lebanese civilians dont want to end up in a mass grave either. If you wont stand up for civilization for them why should I or anyone else stand up for civiliation for you? If we are all being so calculated and tactical as you are, whats in it for me to save you? I’m not part of the trans community.

      You dont even need to stand for justice-- just stand enough that we are neutral-- that we stop sending bombs,funding, and troops, and lending coverage in the UN. Do it for your own self respect and dignity, even.

      • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Innocent Americans don’t want to suffer either.

        Vote for orange arsewipe or his conservative enablers, Americans will suffer.

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          In the process of playing chicken with her to see who blinks first, yes, she might lose some votes. But she was going to lose some votes anyway because of the far right Israeli war, that she could win back that number and more if she alters her position to one that resonates with more Americans around the legends we tell ourselves about who we are. These are votes in key swing states that she could gain.

          That loss of votes either way is on her and the cadre of scumbag consultants doing tactical spreadsheets based on issue support, weighing if they can keep that sweet sweet AIPAC money. You are just playing her and netenyahus game and you cant even see it that you have multiple peoples hands up your rear using you as a sock puppet. You allow that because you are utterly terrified, and that part is understandable.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Again, I’m not saying that it’s okay to sacrifice Palestinians needlessly or that their lives are less important.

        I’m saying to wait a god damn month for the election to be over before we start fighting the Democratic Party

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Presidents do care about votes during an election. They dont care about sit ins and student protests. You’re asking everyone to abandon any pushback of an active genocide. You are asking them to actively support it in fact. Why not pressure Harris to get her to pledge to stop it instead.

          • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            My one concern about her openly opposing the genocide in Gaza is that it would likely cause the electoral college to just hand the vote to Trump. That will be way worse for Palestinians overall. Don’t forget Trump didn’t win the popular vote in 2016.

            Unfortunately there are too many people in the US government who are invested in supporting Israel, and it’s not out of the realm of possibility that the electoral college is compromised like our supreme court is. Israel could be the make it or break it on that front.

      • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Simple question: do you think voting in Trump again will make fighting for stopping the genocide in Gaza & Lebanon earlier or harder?

          • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            That’s a non answer. Do you think helping steer votes away from her and towards Trump helps or hurts your goal of ending the genocide?

            • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              I think it makes no difference whatsoever, when both are bought off by AIPAC money toward the same ends. But I do think there is only one that can conceivably be pressured to stop doing that, and only our every 4 year vote matters to them. Pushing on Trump is useless. This is your one chance to lift a finger to do the right thing with some pushback and demanding the shipments stop.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yea sounds great. Just accept genocide of the Palestinians and stop complaining about our paychecks funding war crimes and genocide every month. After all, it’s just genocide, right?

      I agree, I don’t mind it happening to people over there as long as it doesn’t happen to me. It’s just genocide.

      • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Biden had a catastrophically low approval rating and was doomed to lose even before the medical stuff came to light. He had far lower numbers than any dem in the past 80 years at that point in the cycle. If you want to pretend “whining” got us Harris instead of Bidens poor choices, thats fine, but the math tells a different story.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you want to pretend “whining” got us Harris instead of Bidens poor choices

          The people “whining” are criticizing those same poor choices.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fucking right?! Hate is being preached from the pulpit every Sunday supporting this clown and the machine pulling his strings.

      In many places in this country our queer brothers and sisters are in mortal danger. These people hate and demonize the different and the other. It’s an old playbook, but, it sure does work.

      If you don’t think the machine would put our people in camps; you’re wearing blinders and don’t know your history. Lives depend on this election.

      • mostdubious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        i say we put THEM in camps. we need to stop taking the high road. your moral high horse will not win a war. the true moral high ground is stopping these lunatics by whatever means necessary.

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          My moral high horse?

          I moved my family out of the deep South to a purple state. Every one in my house knows how to shoot, as well. That’s about as much as I know to do.

          • mostdubious@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            not yours, but the left’s in general.

            i appreciate your efforts. sorry to confuse. i use lemmy as my personal void to scream into sometimes.

            • Machinist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              I understand and do the same. It scares the shit out of me how ignorant the left is of the danger we’re in. Blows my fucking mind. People really don’t know even recent history.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    No not ‘‘at risk’’. This is his NUMBER ONE policy promise. He’s running on this. Explicitly. Why are we pretending it’s not?

    • tmyakal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Because last time his number one policy promise was to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it. And his number two promise was an alternative to Obamacare.

      He’s not so great at following through with his promises. That’s the only thing non-MAGAs have going for them: he’s pretty incompetent.

      • AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Doesn’t need to be competent in order to say “hey, go kill some people who make you feel uncomfortable, we give you tacit approval and you’ll be the new Kyle Rittenhouse”