They are literally everywhere. I can’t go any place without being watched. I just want some privacy. The most alarming part is that they put cameras on all entrances and exits so they can know who’s entering or leaving. Why do they need to stalk me as I go about my day? The area I live in is overall pretty safe so I don’t see the justification.

I have also noticed that some people actually feel safe where there are cameras. I get that people can get scared but I don’t think creating a giant network of mass surveillance is the answer.

What is this dystopian future we have marched into.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I want to punch people in the throat who say “YOU HAVE NO EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN A PUBLIC PLACE” because like, yeah, I know, I’d fucking like to though.

  • IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    my mother has installed cameras in every room of her house except the bathroom. and external cameras. they are also internet connected. I tried to explain to her how these things are not secure and can easily be tapped into but she wouldn’t hear it

      • cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I encourage everyone to carry around an internet-connected audio-video listening device on their person at all times. Not only to have calls potentially tapped but also a microphone that can listen at any time and a non-removable battery.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Then you really don’t want to know about mesh license plate readers.

    They allow 24/7 monitoring of all drivers any where in a city … in real time

    • Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’re horrific and apparently invisible to people. Any time I point them out I’ve been called crazy and told I was overreacting. Until driving around Illinois with a coworker when he started to understand the scale of it all. The more I see the more dizzying it becomes. There needs to be regulation for them

  • Anonymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    If it helps quell any anxiety, the ring cameras are not made of quality components. A neighbor with a south facing camera said that the camera was there when they moved in, but the lens is so sun damaged that you can’t see anything. It was installed maybe 2 years ago. They said that they only use it as a doorbell now.

    As mentioned in another post, a malicious neighbor could blast UV light at the cameras day and night for a while to make the camera mostly ineffectve.

  • 3 dogs in a trenchcoat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Some random creep put up a ring camera pointed directly at the bus stop near my house. It’s technically on their property but it’s pointed right at the bus stop it’s creepy as hell. Why can’t they just monitor their own door instead

  • bamfic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have had them in airbnbs i was renting!

    Current landlord has one just outside my apartment and it records audio. Fucking creepy

  • Goun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m guessing it’s like this everywhere, but in my country, public cameras also have microphones. I feel like we don’t think about that a lot.

  • PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I saw an article about Chinese EVs being equipped with overly-powerful LiDAR for self driving or something, which meant that in essence, they drive about the places burning out camera sensors. This got me thinking - The human eye takes a lot more energy to damage it than the average ccd chip, and a small cheap laser pointer is way more than enough to wreck one. Would it be possible to get a LiDAR unit and pop it on a remote control car or a drone or something?

    There’s a group in London that call themselves the Bladerunners who go around wrecking the ULEZ cameras, they use a few interesting methods, but they’re all a bit too direct, such as sawzalling camera poles down. The LiDAR looks like a better option.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’d be worried about long term damage to humans. There also is the tinsey tiny issue of it being highly illegal.

      The best think I can think of is pointing cameras out to everyone and making a fuss over it.

  • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I was literally in a CAVE the other day and I looked up and saw “under video surveillance”. You can’t even escape it 100 meters under the earth.

    Yes it was a privately owned attraction. That’s not an excuse.

    • Skates@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      privately owned

      Nah sorry, conversation ends there.

      Cameras on private property don’t affect you. Also, they are never because of the kindness of humanity. They’re always because someone was a bad neighbor/bad tourist/bad human. You can wish all you want for the state to not have you under surveillance - that’s fine. But if you wanna enter private property, you succumb to private rules. And if you don’t wanna do that, you can stay out.

  • Tazerface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I started wearing a N95 for medical reasons a few years ago and this may help with the cameras.

    I’ve never done a selfie or posted any photos of my face on social media. I have a driver’s license but my country has privacy laws so that information shouldn’t be available to any company that wants it. On the other hand, The War Amps has access so maybe stores do as well.

    I feel naked without a ballcap. A few stores in my area have the cameras at eye-level. I look down when entering or exiting if I’m not wearing sunglasses.

    I never use the self checkouts. These often have high def cameras inches from one’s face. This is an effective way to connect a customer’s face and their name by way of a credit or bank card.

    I always use cash.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The facial recognition is done mostly to the eyes so the mask doesn’t protect too much, you would want glasses and a cap

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I feel like you’re slipping too much into the paranoia region. Also masks don’t help with face recognition that much

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, I know you know better than everyone else, and everyone who disagrees is just an uneducated pleb, but this one you can test for yourself. More than half of the nodal points needed for the face recognition are above the centroid of the face, which usually a top point of a mask, and half of the other half are the outer part of the face which mask doesn’t conceal much. You need less then a half of the points to reliably recognize a face, and even me, stupid rube with no education, can do the math here.

          • Tazerface@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Assuming I’m paranoid and not knowing how much surveillance we are under are your uneducated opinions.

            BTW I didn’t read your reply but I’m sure it was full of snappy comebacks.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I adamantly maintain that the US needs an entire movement to enshrine the right to privacy to its citizens in the constitution.

    • VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been wondering how far I could get making a pitch for religious freedom from advertising. Should possibly think about it as religious freedom from tracking in general.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Including medical privacy. The forced birthers can fuck right off about knowing my wife’s menstrual cycle.

  • joewilliams007@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    i dont know about your country, but in germany its regulated and in public places the footage is only allowed to be stored up to 72 hours