No, ais “learning” is modeled off of how people think, and there’s a lot of overlap between what looks like ai and what is actually a tired and stressed person trying to both do the right thing and finish anything ., at 5 am. The morning before the election.
I’ve been doing daily posts for a year now, acquired 5200 subscribers across 3 platforms and Il b honest I am now deeply sympathetic to how the current media landscape got to where it is
Knock it off with the BS dude. You knew exactly what you were doing. Show police brutality all you want but don’t fucking lie about it. All it does is show that you’re dishonest instead of what’s going on. You’re stifling your own message.
For those who can’t figure it out from the photo and refuse to go to a Meta owned platform:
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/bowie-police-officer-indicted-after-firing-shots-unarmed-man
Surely that article was written by AI. It’s chock full of syntax errors. Might just be “Fox quality” though.
Yeah I admit I went with the first one that provided me enough info to have any idea what had actually happened.
No, ais “learning” is modeled off of how people think, and there’s a lot of overlap between what looks like ai and what is actually a tired and stressed person trying to both do the right thing and finish anything ., at 5 am. The morning before the election.
No, it is modeled off of how they communicate. It does not understand how people think.
The rest of your point is accurate.
Adjusted the title.
I’ve been doing daily posts for a year now, acquired 5200 subscribers across 3 platforms and Il b honest I am now deeply sympathetic to how the current media landscape got to where it is
Knock it off with the BS dude. You knew exactly what you were doing. Show police brutality all you want but don’t fucking lie about it. All it does is show that you’re dishonest instead of what’s going on. You’re stifling your own message.
Apparently the man’s hat blew into the roadway and the officer shot when said man ran to grab it.
So why is OP saying the man was executed and meanwhile the article is stating that not a single person was hit by the bullet?
Well there was intent to execute, but yeah, I’m with ya.
The important thing is that he missed!
/s