• ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      0·
      11 days ago

      Apparently the man’s hat blew into the roadway and the officer shot when said man ran to grab it.

      So why is OP saying the man was executed and meanwhile the article is stating that not a single person was hit by the bullet?

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      0·
      11 days ago

      Surely that article was written by AI. It’s chock full of syntax errors. Might just be “Fox quality” though.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        11 days ago

        Yeah I admit I went with the first one that provided me enough info to have any idea what had actually happened.

      • alphanerd4@lemmy.worldOPM
        0·
        11 days ago

        No, ais “learning” is modeled off of how people think, and there’s a lot of overlap between what looks like ai and what is actually a tired and stressed person trying to both do the right thing and finish anything ., at 5 am. The morning before the election.

        • snooggums@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          11 days ago

          ais “learning” is modeled off of how people think

          No, it is modeled off of how they communicate. It does not understand how people think.

          The rest of your point is accurate.

    • alphanerd4@lemmy.worldOPM
      0·
      11 days ago

      Adjusted the title.

      I’ve been doing daily posts for a year now, acquired 5200 subscribers across 3 platforms and Il b honest I am now deeply sympathetic to how the current media landscape got to where it is

      • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
        0·
        11 days ago

        Knock it off with the BS dude. You knew exactly what you were doing. Show police brutality all you want but don’t fucking lie about it. All it does is show that you’re dishonest instead of what’s going on. You’re stifling your own message.

  • Rakonat@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    11 days ago

    “Cops are can tell if you’re intoxcitated without tests.”

    Mother fuckers can’t even tell if a person is a threat to their life despite showing no hostile intention, weapon or anything but cooperation.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      0·
      11 days ago

      Sure they can. Anyone without an assigned police badge is a threat. That’s all they need to know.

  • snooggums@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    11 days ago

    Hey look, it is the natural outcome of training police to assume everyone is armed armed and out to get them.

    • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
      0·
      11 days ago

      Exactly. Guy was so jumpy he mistook a man running after his hat for an armed shooter. That’s baked-in paranoia if I’ve ever seen it.

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    0·
    11 days ago

    Lmao

    “He fell to the ground but was not hit by the bullet. The shot hits a passing vehicle but doesn’t injure anyone.”

    He even missed point blank