Tux@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWindows is actually pretty good OSlemmy.worldimagemessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1963arrow-down169
arrow-up1894arrow-down1imageWindows is actually pretty good OSlemmy.worldTux@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square131fedilink
minus-squarejatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoyes, because folders are not something thats really worthwhile in a filesystem. they’re a vestige of an earlier time.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoFolders, or directories, really, may not be worthwhile, but when you have more than fifteen files, they’re quite convenient.
minus-squarejatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoUserspace concept is my point dont need them in the file system itself
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoIn that case you’re left with applications implementing it, and hoping for something homogeneous. Which may or may not happen. I wouldn’t trust it.
minus-squarejatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agosounds like a you problem. if you think longer on it maybe you’ll come up with the obvious layer to implement it at that isn’t the kernel.
minus-squarejatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 day agoSee desktop portals, and desktop environments you dont need to use the kernel for the folder structure. And shared implantations for adding them in are fairly trivial.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 day agoI think you’re confusing user interfaces and API structures there. Also file systems don’t have to be in the kernel. User space file systems are a thing and work fine.
minus-squarejatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 day ago??? Im not confusing those at all. You literally just repeated what i said.
minus-squaredesktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agofolders are a convenient organization strategy
minus-squarejatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoIndeed they are! Just don’t need them in the filesystem itself
yes, because folders are not something thats really worthwhile in a filesystem. they’re a vestige of an earlier time.
Folders, or directories, really, may not be worthwhile, but when you have more than fifteen files, they’re quite convenient.
Userspace concept is my point dont need them in the file system itself
In that case you’re left with applications implementing it, and hoping for something homogeneous. Which may or may not happen.
I wouldn’t trust it.
sounds like a you problem. if you think longer on it maybe you’ll come up with the obvious layer to implement it at that isn’t the kernel.
Enlighten us instead of being a dick lol
See desktop portals, and desktop environments you dont need to use the kernel for the folder structure. And shared implantations for adding them in are fairly trivial.
I think you’re confusing user interfaces and API structures there.
Also file systems don’t have to be in the kernel. User space file systems are a thing and work fine.
??? Im not confusing those at all. You literally just repeated what i said.
folders are a convenient organization strategy
Indeed they are! Just don’t need them in the filesystem itself