• skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    The problem is repairs, you are held hostage by Tesla, so even a fender bender turns into a write off, or months without the vehicle whereas a normal shop could fix it up in a day with regular parts.

    Just don’t buy tesla and you should be ok.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m all for hating on Tesla for legitimate issues, but the driver of that car crashed into a concrete pillar doing in excess of 120MPH, which probably has a lot more to do with why they died than anything else. Fires and being trapped inside mangled wreckage can happen with any vehicle, especially at speeds like that.

        • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          We had a similar situation when Teslas were new here in Europe and a Model X crashed head on into the median on the autobahn at full speed (130km/h or 80mph).

          The guy died because he didn’t wear any seatbelt and was ejected from the car. The car looked horrendous but he would have survived if he wore a seatbelt.

          Doesn’t stop the media from printing “Tesla kills driver” for 2 weeks straight.

        • towerful
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I felt like making a sarcastic comment about “all that extra safety tech”.
          But 120mph is pretty fucking ridiculous.
          Except, that’s a head on collision on a 60mph road.
          So, I’m not sure how to feel.

          Still don’t think I’d get in a Tesla just on principle, tho

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            37 minutes ago

            But 120mph is pretty fucking ridiculous. Except, that’s a head on collision on a 60mph road.

            Incorrect, for two reasons: 1, kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed. Twice as fast, quadruple the energy. 2, in a head-on collision, the crumple zones of both vehicles absorb the energy. I doubt the concrete pillar absorbed much.

            The MythBusters did a nice episode on this.