SatyrSack@feddit.org to 30 Rock@dubvee.orgEnglish · 2 days agoWhen someone explains to you how "baby" is their pet name for their significant other [captioned screencap] [animated]feddit.orgimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up114arrow-down1imageWhen someone explains to you how "baby" is their pet name for their significant other [captioned screencap] [animated]feddit.orgSatyrSack@feddit.org to 30 Rock@dubvee.orgEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
S2E15 “Cooter” Full quality MP4: Your browser does not support playing HTML5 video. You can download a copy of the video file instead.
minus-squareMajorHavoclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoThat’s interesting. I think Derrida had it right. I feel like we’ve had a hint about that in database design for years - no matter how closely we think we have modeled the underlying reality to be tracked, we always eventually discover that we have not.
minus-squarePlease_Do_Not@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 hours agoAgreed! Which ultimately means the more confident you are that the system tracks, the farther you are from seeing the whole thing…
![When someone explains to you how "baby" is their pet name for their significant other [captioned screencap] [animated]](https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/4c155762-0b93-4885-bd84-90fb3816b4a0.webp){kind=link}
That’s interesting. I think Derrida had it right.
I feel like we’ve had a hint about that in database design for years - no matter how closely we think we have modeled the underlying reality to be tracked, we always eventually discover that we have not.
Agreed! Which ultimately means the more confident you are that the system tracks, the farther you are from seeing the whole thing…