Even if it wasn’t so much “manipulative”.

  • AntifaTeamLead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I have and will continue to make a small number of obvious omissions or minor misspellings in my work when I submit it to my bosses for review. Not in the majority of my work, but mostly when they may have some resistance or hesitation on a course of action or a part of the project.

    If I can trick them into contributing to the project by fixing or improving it, they end up feeling ownership of it in a way they wouldn’t have otherwise. I do this on purpose, and turn a hesitater into a champion of the work. It’s our project now!

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Oddly enough I have done this in reverse to Jr members of my team. Amazing the engagement you get when they catch something they see as obvious, and thanking them brings up moral.

      • AntifaTeamLead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s a win-win for everyone. Plus, if the person misses the obvious thing, you know what not to trust them with in the future!

    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I ask leading questions that make people think an idea is theirs. Business people love their own ideas. A woman’s? Not so much.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        This is an example of “managing up”. It requires understanding people well, a particular weakness of mine.