• outstanding_bond@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s so tragic that we have no records of Washington, Tesla, da Vinci, Newton, Faraday, or Kant. If only they’d thought to have kids they might have left a mark on the world.

    • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This lmao.

      “Being forgotten and replaced” is racist propaganda

      And people will fall for it constantly.

      Pro tip: if a right wing think tank can fear you into making a human life then maybe you are too stupid to responsibly raise children

    • Norin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nah, I reckon we’re better off for Kant not procreating. That guy gets worse the more you look into him.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    My branch of the family tree dies with me. My family name is probably in the rarest few percent (I tried checking previously and got some fraction of a percent, but I don’t know how accurate that site was). Technically, though, as several of us uploaded DNA to various sites, it’s not completely lost in that sense. However, I just don’t care, really; I think it’s weirdly self-important to be concerned with a name or bloodline carrying on like humanity won’t survive without it somehow.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah its a fun concept.

      Like imagine you just go back in time and randomly kill a person. Bam, a lot of people never get born, history changes dramatically.

      Having a child is biggest butterfly effect you can have on the space time contiuum. Want more chaos, have more children. LET CHAOS REIGN!

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        But other people fill their roles, with the main difference being just genetics, so probably on average very similar behavior. And most people don’t do anything too exceptional or history changing. So would “ending a bloodline” really be more impactful than say causing a traffic jam, if all it’s really doing is applying a passive RNG shuffle to everything?

  • Boinkage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bloodline doesn’t have to end for that to happen. Even if you have kids, in three generations no one will remember your name or your life. Do you know the names and history of your great great grandparents? No one will remember us and it will not be important whether they do or don’t.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you know the names and history of your great great grandparents?

      On my dad’s side, actually yes. They died either side of 100 when I was in my early 20s. I’m old enough to remember spending time with them and hearing about their lives. I didn’t meet the other sides, but my maternal grandfather compiled a book about his line which was quite interesting (and this was when one still had to go to the library and search through newspapers, etc. or have them call other libraries to get info).

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is very true, and also, the reverse is true as well: your bloodline can end yet you can still be remembered if you did something remarkable enough. I’m sure there are tons of well known figures in history whose bloodlines are no more today

      • Sergio@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        One of the things I learned as a scientist is that for any major accomplishment, there are thousands of people who did difficult, necessary, and not-widely-recognized work to make that accomplishment possible.

        • Danitos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I like to think that things are even more complicated, as we depend on a lot of people, even if we are not aware of it: random taxi/bus drivers, restaurant/grocery staff, your ISP workers, random factory workers, etc.

          We depend on far mote people than we realize, and not just us but also people working in advancing the limits of human knowledge. We wouldn’t have Einstein without some of his totally unexpected yet unkownly related contemporanies. Following this logic, we wouldn’t have Einstein without his grandparents, and even those grandparent’s contemporanies, and this just keeps going.

          As Lain says, we are all connected.

    • Oaksey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you know the names and history of your great great grandparents?

      Yes. I guess permanently moving halfway around the world is notable. Although that also means the next generation will know what their great great great grandparents did.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      yeah and its like whats a bloodline. There is the whole mitochondrial eve thing. I saw a youtube video on genetics and variation and generations and it did not take long for less than 1% of enetics to be in common with an ancestor and they used the british royal family as an examples so pretty inbred to.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It happens anyway. It’s possible, but very very unlikely, that within two generations none of your grandkids shares any DNA with you.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    My bloodline ends with me, but I have step kids. So kinda yes, but kinda no more than a typical person whose genes do continue but their story is forgotten eventually.

    This really hit me recently when sorting my mom’s belongings and finding a ton of photographs of people I don’t recognize, and having nobody left to ask about who they were, how/if they were related to me, and what their life was like.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      On the biological level, true enough.

      I find it kinda fascinating that every single ancestor of mine lived long enough to procreate. My life can be directly linked to some unknown single celled organisms billions of years ago and every evolutionary step between those and a human, that’s really weird to think about.