• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Because to a certain extent Python is duck typed. Python has no concept of interfaces, unless you count the abc module combined with manual isinstance() checks, which I’ve never seen anyone do in production. In order to be passed to some function that expects a “file-like object”, it just has to have methods named read(), seek(), and possibly isatty(). The Python philosophy, at least as I see it, is “as long as it has methods named walk() and quack(), it’s close enough to a duck for me to treat it as one”.

    Duck typing is distinct from weak type systems, though.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Thank you for acknowledging that. I’d also like to say for the record that you were literally one word off from being correct.

        • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          In my head I had conflated duck and weak typing. I’m not an oop programmer (tbh I’m not much of a programmer to begin with) and since what Python does e.g. with file handles is closer to say in Haskell making a wrapper

          DataStream x -> FileHandle x

          Where like implementing the read/write/open etc methods are equivalent to implementing the function mappings.

          Which is very different from say JS “Herr durr I’m going to cast an int to a string and then error” I assumed the latter was “duck typing”