• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Individual tragedies are never going to be prevented. You might as well mandate kids exist in giant hamster balls 24/7.

    Oh, but then they might suffocate.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s perfectly preventable in other countries. In the western world, this is pretty much a uniquely American experience.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You can’t undo the 2nd amendment, there are over 400 million guns in the country.

        The fact that there are only 11 deaths per year on a population of 400 million guns shows just how insignificant the problem is.

        It’s not even a “1 in a million” kind of thing.

        It’s a 1 in 36 million kind of thing.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, no amendment can be undone in the current climate.

            Doing it requires a 290 votes in the House, a body that last needed 15 tries to get a 218 vote simple majority to decide who their own leader will be.

            Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate, a body that’s blocked from doing anything by a 60 vote majority to break a filibuster.

            If by some miracle, both of those things happen, then the change needs to be ratified by 38 states.

            In the last election, Trump won 31 states, so he’d need 7 Harris states to back him on repealing an amendment. Aint happening.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        We should ban seat belts, then. Theres a non-zero chance that they could trap you in a car in a crash leading to your death. Never mind that the chance is statistically insignificant.

        Also, do other countries mandate this safety feature?

        • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Seat belts are designed specifically to save people’s lives. In action, they prevent a lot more deaths than they cause. Firearms are designed specifically to take people’s lives. In action, they cause a lot more deaths than they prevent.