• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s not viable for the mainstream. “It depends on the person” suggests it’s luck of the draw, but the Linux desktop penetration is something like 1-4%, at best, and that’s inlcuding SteamOS and PiOS in the mix.

    That’s not, “depends on the person”, that’s “doesn’t work for the vast majority of people”. There is a reason for that.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah I’m not going to lie that’s kind of a weird take.

      By that logic captain crunch cereal isn’t ready for mainstream because it doesn’t have enough market share.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        We may not be reading the word “mainstream” the same way here, because when you have a small oligopoly with one player at 75%, one at 15% and one at 4%… well, yeah, one of those is mainstream and one of those is not. That’s kind of how being mainstream works. Hell, that’s borderline monopolistic.

        That’s not the same as a commodity where dozens or hundreds of options are available and compete on relatively equal footing. The comparison isn’t Captain Crunch versus Corn Flakes, it’s Coca-Cola versus Green Cola. I can find Green Cola in my supermarket… but it sure as hell isn’t the mainstream choice.

        That’s different to “being ready for the mainstream”, though. Linux is not mainstream because it has big blockers that prevent it. The lack of readiness is a cause of the lack of mainstream appeal, not the other way around. For the same reason that Green Cola’s stevia-forward absolutely wild aftertaste is a cause of its lack of mainstream appeal.

        I do realize not everybody will get this comparison, but if you know you know.