• GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    To hear it from the conservative side of my family … “Is there no limit on how many people he can commute?” and “There’s no way he’s able to sign all those letters, he can barely keep his eyes open.”

    I don’t know how accurate it is, but they were saying he has already freed 1,500 people. I asked how many of those people were convicted of non-violent drug related charges, and they did not know nor did they seem to care. I thought that was interesting given some of my relatives’, shall we call it, histories.

      • Corigan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I know, I Said should not would. Who knows the person puppeting him weekend at Bernie’s style might?

        Look I need something to hope for lmao.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Morally it’s the right thing to do in my eyes. It’s also surprising how the pro life and pro death penalty people are the same people usually.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s only surprising if you know nothing about the group beyond the inaccurate name they use to identify themselves

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s a very bad joke o remember hearing a long time ago. It’s something along the lines of: “I’m in favor of killing babies, but I don’t like to give women a choice.” Most pro-life people actually are that, except they extended “baby” way before birth in a stupid way. They’re fine with killing actually post-birth babies though.

    • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I actually have a friend who’s quite… strange. He’s pretty right wing, very into certain conspiracy theories, pro musk, etc, yet one of the nicest guys you’ll meet and certainly the guy you’d be calling to bail you out of jail in a pinch. Anyways, he actually opposes the death penalty exactly because he’s pro life. Said he couldn’t reconcile both of those stances.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s good! That means he’s at least a reasonable person. He can think for himself and can consider if ideas are idiologically consistent. I hope that eventually translates to him having empathy with people and then noticing how conservative politics fucks people over just for the sake of having an enemy though.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      He didn’t commute the one Boston bomber, Dylan Roof, and the Tree of Life shooter. Which is good. I don’t agree with the death penalty but you can’t really pardon people like that.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not a pardon. They would still be subject to the harshest punishment possible in civilized countries, and would never again be a threat to anyone.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think you can, especially when the sentence is still life in prison. Remember that accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt, so they would not ever be paroled.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s also surprising how the pro life and pro death penalty people are the same people usually.

      It shouldn’t be. There is actually no contradiction or mutual exclusivity between the two; it only seems that way because of how the former viewpoint is labeled (it was definitely a PR move to call it “pro life” instead of “anti abortion”, which is a more accurate description of the stance).

      Pro lifers believe the unborn are morally equivalent to the newly born, and therefore believe killing/destroying (depending on your perspective) the unborn is equivalent to murder (defined as ‘undeserved killing/execution’), since the unborn is innocent by definition. And because they, like everyone else, believe murder is immoral, they also believe abortion is immoral.

      This does not conflict at all with being in favor of the death penalty for someone guilty of a major crime against humanity, because such a person is not innocent, unlike the unborn child.

      In fact, on another axis, these two stances are actually in perfect alignment (except in cases of rape, etc. which I believe is why many pro lifers do in fact make exceptions for those cases, being okay with abortion then), in that they both come from the mindset of ‘you must take responsibility and be held accountable for your actions’.

      Hope that clears things up a bit.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Of course, Trump will have millions of death row sentences to hand down once they find out how expensive those concentration camps are and how long it will take to get countries to be willing to take all of those millions of people back and decides to come up with a Final Solution.

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      We already have a well-developed forced labor prison infrastructure, and there will be plenty of farm work to do. The camps will pay for themselves, and enrich big corporations in the process.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, lots of people are going to make lots of money off of this. Just not the brown people working in the fields. I guess this is what the GOP means when talk about the good old days.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They won’t do shit, taking away the strawberry pickers and pool boys isn’t on the agenda. They’ll spend money on border patrols, ship off some brown people that are easy to catch, trumpet about it in the news and go back to making money off their backs. It was all a dog and pony show.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Can I borrow your crystal ball to look up next week’s lotto numbers?

        Also, I would really love to listen in on your secret microphones at Mar-a-Lago.

        (When someone tells you they’re going to commit genocide, maybe the best thing to do is err on the side of caution and believe it.)

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Check back in a year from now and tell me how I’m wrong instead of being a prick right now.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Or we could all err on the side of caution, as I said, rather than just assume it won’t happen. I’m not sure why you think assuming it won’t happen and continuing on as if genocide in America isn’t possible when we’ve already done it multiple times is the best course of action.

  • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    We need to quit wasting time and resources on these type of shooters and bad people get them gone and let’s grow better as a civilization.

    Those resources could be utilized in a more appropriate fashion such as wrongful conviction cases or anything to help better humanity in any way rather than 70k a year to keep each inmate and its not the monetary value its the goods and services value. Resource cost.

    I guess I am pro death penalty.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s basically what Biden is doing here. In the US executing someone is magnitudes more expensive than life in prison. Depending on the state it can be anywhere from 2 to 10 times more expensive than life in prison.

    • Isoprenoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      We need to quit wasting time and resources on these type of shooters and bad people get them gone and let’s grow better as a civilization.

      While I understand your position, I disagree. Instead of death, if we do our best to learn about these people and prevent further destruction we’ll all be better off (if that means life imprisonment, then so be it). I’m sure there are plenty of criminologists willing to curate that knowledge.

      If we learn more about them, then we gain the tools to grow better as a civilisation as you put it.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If we had a perfectly equal system, I would be in favor of the death penalty but we don’t. That means we are executing a wildly disproportionate amount of poor black men. I can’t support such a system.