• cranakis@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Democrats let it happen and let it slide after the fact. The GOP is criminal. The Democrats are just lazy and weak.

    Unger reserved his most intense criticism for the Washington Post, which owned Newsweek at the time and, he says, had an outsize role in quietly killing the story. He’s also equally critical of Congressional Democrats, who he claims never pursued the dramatic charges as earnestly as they should have.

    “Democrats were lap dogs,” Unger said

    From here:https://www.press.org/newsroom/media-covered-1980-iran-hostage-deal-october-surprise-author-tells-club

      • Zink
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        When the majority of our voting public just chose the GREATER evil in all three branches of government, the lesser evil is still significant harm reduction.

        And if the lesser evil had won all three branches of the federal government, maybe we’d instead be talking about how the voters sent a signal that the greater evil needs to tone down all the evil, and things can move in the right direction.

        But nope, let’s just pull the lever on the max-evil slot machine to see whether we end up ma more in cyberpunk, nazis, or mad max!

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Democrats serve the rich class. They’re a red herring to make us believe that we are a democracy

  • Coach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “This was genuine treason by the GOP.”

    Nah…just a typical Wednesday for them.

  • TwoFacedJanus1968@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    It was not unprecedented. Nixon sabotaged the Vietnam War peace talks to get elected too. Don’t think that has ever been addressed very well either.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nothing new here. Regan was the flashpoint of the dumpster fire that is America now. Nixon was just the match. Trump is a tanker truck full of napalm.

    • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wouldn’t give Trump that much credit (yet), the damage done by Reagan was far greater (disregarding social/demographic, which I mostly blame the attention industry of). But we’ll see how much damage he does this time, maybe he “trumps” Reagan…

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        He’s speaking openly about imprisoning political opponents and even members of his own party that didn’t bend the knee. And now the Courts he packed are backing up his claims to absolute immunity.

        He even said people will no longer “need to vote” after he’s done.

        The best hope for America right now is an aneurysm.

        • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah definitely, it could escalate to a complete shit-show unfortunately, as they even got senate and house as well… I’m lucky currently that I’m european, not that politics is heading in the right direction, but we’re not yet at autocratic level as could happen in the USA…

    • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      When a large majority of media conglomerates being conservative, like the Sinclaire group, it makes sharing this news with Americans very difficult.

      Throw in education restrictions to keep kids from learning about these events in school, you’ve got a steep uphill battle to raise awareness.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They keep doing it. And then they do other shady shit like schedule the pulling of troops out of Syria Afghanistan for next year because it won’t be their problem by then. 🤷‍♂️

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        lmfao I had a feeling something was off when I wrote that and didn’t give it a second thought. But yes, thank you!

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Luckily, your Democrat party is like “it is beneath us us to even notice such filth”.

      It’s not very effective though.

          • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I would assume he is sarcastically shitting on the great many Lemmy users who, instead of blaming our fellow countrymen who actively chose the path of evil, immediately blamed democrats for not doing enough to do xyz where xyz is that user’s pet interest (Bernie, Gaza, profits, trans rights, term limits, etc).

            Those Lemmy users are of course quite dumb.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    A sacrifice to the elite, for the greater good of wealth concentration, the gods of greed demanded it.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh, are we counting treasons again? I guess mid-century modern is actually a thing now. Good, it’s a nice aesthetic. Bell bottoms and protest, fuck yeah.

    Maybe this time we can follow through, eh? We’ve seen what happens when we don’t.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good thing they learnt their lessions and itll never happen again. On a completely unrelated note did you know that Hamas is planning on releasing their hostages mysteriously as soon as Trump gets elected, Bibi is also planning on starting serious peace talks at the same time.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump’s behavior is not “weird”; it’s standard American politics.

      It’s not. I remember all the presidents since Nixon. The stuff Treason Trump did is an order of magnitude worse than anything that came before.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Reagan did not try to overthrow democracy. He didn’t conspire with Russia against America. He didn’t try to blackmail a foreign power into dishonestly interfering with a US election. He didn’t retain 60 boxes of classified secrets after leaving office. He didn’t sexually assault 26 women. He didn’t tell 30000+ lies in 4 years. He didn’t say that immigrants were eating our cats and dogs.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            And despite not doing any of that he still inflicted massive generational harm to the United States. As bad as Trump? Only time will tell.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even knowing everything that has come before intimately doesn’t make Trumps stuff make any sense. There is a reason all the professional historians, including the ones politically on his side, are up in arms about him and his plans. This is not “business as usual”, he is as bad as literally everyone that has any idea about any of this stuff says he is.

      He is way too easy to corrupt and sway. He has no idea what he is doing and trusts all the wrong people because they play him so easily. He’s a “useful idiot”, but useful to people who want to bring America down or just make more money for themselves. He still thinks all of his plans are his own ideas, or at least that he is doing them for his own reasons, but they are just tapping into his overblown self-confidence and ego.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      see worse is, surprisingly for some, worse than bad and then, this is pretty advanced now, even worse is worse than worse. its trippy.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Do you remember how Trump chose not to address COVID for political gains when it looked like it was hitting primarily democratic cities? I’ve seen some calculations that half a million more Americans died from COVID because of his reaction to it. That’s treason on a level nobody has reached

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          how do you feel about the whole iranian general missile thing. that felt like it could have gone very, very wrong. Keep in mind to that he was largely still using the established beuracracy when he came in and this go round he has a lot more intended people and many military people said they had to keep him in check.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            My understanding is that Soleimani was responsible for the deployment of a type of anti-vehicle mine in Iraq that killed hundreds to perhaps in the low thousands of US soldiers. A lot of the military brass wanted him dead for personal reasons and Trump was too weak to resist their urging he be taken out. Trump may have avoided immediate consequences because Soleimani was more useful as a martyr to the Iranian leadership at this point. In the long run it fueled another generation’s anti-US animus.

            • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              yeah it was a moment when it was like. did he just start ww3. I mean I think everyone was bowled over at how small the response was from iran. it was just a dangerous as fuck thing to do.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a theocracy, I’m not sure why you would expect it to care that much. But also, the theory is that part of the deal was for weapons to be deliered to Iran. Iran’s military had been weakened badly in the revolution, Iraq was right next door with a very large military, the new Iranian government had called for the Iraqi one to be overthrown, and the two had existing border tensions that would go on become a full scale war in less than a year. Seeking weapons to re-arm when ypu expect a fight with a strong neighbour is pretty rational if you ignore the morality of all of it.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not sure why you made assumptions about what I expect? I’m pointing out the failings of their government - they betray their people and work with the US whenever they can, and it never works out for them. That’s the real story as far as I’m concerned.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I said that first part specifically because you called it “the real story” - surely it’s not much of a story if nobody does anything surprising or unexpected, right?

          Either way, this did work out fairly well for Iran. They held the Iraqi invasion off (even if their own counterinvasion was a dud), Reagan continued selling them arms throughout in what would go on to be called the Iran-Contra scandal, and direct American involvement was limited to protecting Kuwaiti oil tankers in the Persian Gulf.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            That’s very short term. Surely you see how getting Reagan elected lead to where Iran relations are today?

            • Skua@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              America was already officially embargoing Iran, and Iran had taken Americans hostage. I don’t think it’s very reasonable to say that this deal made relations any worse than they already were.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                No, but I think it’s reasonable to say Reagan’s “War on Terrorism” lead to Bush’s “War on Terror” and Iran being declared part of the “Axis of Evil”

                Then came Obama and the nuclear deal, and then came Trump and he yanked the rug out from under the nuclear deal.

                Iran cooperating with the US has never really worked out in the long run.

                • Skua@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I think that’s expecting a bit much prediction of the future from the Iranian government, isn’t it? At that point it seemed like America was far more concerned with communism than anything else, and the new Iranian government wasn’t communist. The only time America had sent troops to the western half of Asia between then and WW2 was when Lebanon requested help.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not really. That’s generally just something anyone should expect. After all the United States China Russia etc etc etc etc have all done the same. It’s why allowing a concentration of power. Or in cases like China and Russia demanding a concentration of Power are such bad things. Power corrupts.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The actions of authoritarian governments rarely do. They’re honestly not concerned with long-term thinking or benefit. Because they don’t need to be. It does not benefit them personally to do that extra work.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            “”“Authoritarian”“” governments (really, all governments) are concerned with the continuation of their authority. Iran, it seems, is so desperate to work with the US that it will try over and over again, despite always getting back-stabbed shortly after. See also: the nuclear deal. It’s short sighted and it never works, but they keep doing it. You’d think they’d learn!

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The country that kills girls for not wearing a head covering? That’s the one you’re expecting to take care of it’s people?

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d expect an enemy of the US to not work with the US whenever the opportunity presents itself.

        Iran has always been willing to capitulate, even though they’re touted as America’s #1 enemy in the region.

        It’s an odd relationship.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, it’s not

      But I know that trying to explain it like you were 3 would be too hard for someone posting from .ml