• Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      We won’t. That’s true enough. For tradition alone we won’t; Just like we don’t change to the metric system.

      But it’s not exactly stupid. There are several countries and two continents that surround The Gulf. It’s not unreasonable to name it after both the continents that make it. I’m not even sure how it became named after just a single country anyway.

      Really it’s just another stupid fucking distraction that shouldn’t get any attention from any of us.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Let me tell you about the Persian gulf and the South China Sea.

        When the gulf was named by European explorers in the 1580s, Mexico (as a region colonized by Spain) was the most important thing in the main land. Some Spanish maps from the same time period also called it Gulf of New Spain.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        But it’s not exactly stupid. There are several countries and two continents that surround The Gulf. It’s not unreasonable to name it after both the continents that make it.

        Not quite, the gulf is entirely contained within North America and borders the US, Mexico, and Cuba.

        Once you go around the Yucatan Peninsula, you’re no longer in the gulf, you’re in the Yucatan Channel and then the Yucatan Basin portion of the Caribbean Sea.

        But you’re right in that it’s not exactly stupid, just eyeballing it, it looks like the US has more square miles on the gulf than Mexico does.