• Ilandar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      How did you feel about the opening 45 minutes or whatever it was? The constant time skips, loud music in every scene, etc?

        • Ilandar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          I made it a bit further but also gave up. I guess I wasn’t particularly interested in a Nolan biographical feature to begin with (I feel he is better suited to fiction), but it definitely felt like one of his most self-fellating efforts yet. Sort of just confrationally different for the sake of being different. I bet his fanboys ate it up, though.

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The little flashes and loud music were kind of reminiscent of when you’re really deep into a topic or idea that just consumes all your senses. As for the time skips, since I wasn’t familiar with the history I was right the way confused until maybe the second hour.

        Admittedly I could only get through the whole thing in three sittings, so some of the momentum of the film might have been lost on me :(

    • triptrapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I thought it was fine. Could have been called “Manhattan Project” instead. And as an anti-war American I thought they made a compelling case at the end that the US was “forced” to obliterate all those Japanese civilians, but from a human perspective I still think it was abominable.

      It’s really funny that people did the “Barbenheimer.” The hot pink, light-hearted feminist eye candy into a 3-hour sepiatone drama starring 45 white men. I would have whiplash.