Hey, community :)

I run a website that showcases the best open-source companies. Recently, I’ve added a new feature that filters self-hosted tools and presents them in a searchable format. Although there are other options available, like Awesome-Selfhosted, I found it difficult to find what I needed there, so I decided to display the information in a more digestible format.

You can check out the list here: https://openalternative.co/self-hosted

Let me know if there’s anything else I should add to the list.

Thanks!

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What self-hosted alternative would you recommend for document collaboration? Word processing docs, spreadsheets, pdf’s, etc.

    I was using Nextcloud, but it’s not been as straightforward for file-sharing as I’d like, multiple people can’t work on a document at once, and it doesn’t save changes consistently (especially with fillable PDF’s).

    • rjmalagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Onlyoffice + Nextcloud. Is a little complex to self host the Onlyoffice Document server (the backbone of Onlyoffice collaboration), but it works very nice for multi user document collaboration, it even works on federated instances when using same document server.

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Maybe you wanna collaborate with selfh.st to complete each others list?

    Edit: Looked at the list. Good job on the design and content. Bookmarked it :)

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Wow, that’s a really complete list. Thanks for sharing! I might check out Dokploy some time, it sounds interesting.

    • piotrkulpinski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You should check it for sure! I actually use it to deploy some of the services I need for running OpenAlternative.

  • piotrkulpinski@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Thank you all for the comments and the feedback! I’ve implemented most of the things reported. You can now filter the self-hosted tools by category directly in the filters. Tool cards should now show more info about the product on hover (longer description and the most popular alternative).

    If you see anything else to improve, let me know.

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Love the list, but scrolling through, the one liners don’t mean much for a lot of these.

    The descriptions are just too short and vague to even understand what a lot of them actually do.

    • piotrkulpinski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Added longer description and major alternative when you hover over the cards. Hope that’ll make it easier to browse.

    • piotrkulpinski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Noted! I have longer descriptions in the db, but didn’t want to bloat the listings. Will try with a longer description soon.

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a tough balance, you don’t want a whole page for each one. Maybe if there was a clear list of tags so it’s easier to understand even what category they’re talking about?

        For example:
        Penpot
        Design freedom meets open-source collaboration

        I really don’t know what this product category even is. Is it for web layout? Is it a drawing program? Is it for CAD?

          • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            personally I love it when websites solve this problem with hover hints, theres something satisfying about seeing a paragraph of text on hover that just answers all my questions. not sure how that’d work for people viewing on mobile though

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is the solution. That way i can decide if i want to read more about one of them and then sinply open the dropdown.

  • paequ2@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    One thing I would like to see is a way to distinguish which apps do Real™ Open Source vs fakie open source. For example, I see Joplin on there saying “Your secure, open-source note-taking companion”. I guess that’s technically true at this point in time, but they also force contributors to sign a CLA so they have the option to pull the rug later on. (Something which does happen.)

    They even say so explicitly:

    This is necessary so that if we ever want to change the license again we are able to do so

    https://joplinapp.org/news/20221221-agpl/#what-does-it-change-for-developers

    And fine, if they want to do that it’s up to them. I’d just like a quick way to tell the difference between open source 😒 and Open Source 😄.

    simpsons

    • egerlach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The Free Software Foundation requires “CLAs” as well. I have no fear that they’re going to rug-pull. I don’t think we can use that as the indicator. IMO, it’s even a good idea to have a CLA so that’s no conflict that the project owns the code.

      The warning for me is if the project is run by a company, especially a VC-backed company. Joplin isn’t, so I would be comfortable using it (although I don’t).

      • paequ2@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        Interesting! I didn’t realize this! https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.en.html

        only the copyright holder or someone having assignment of the copyright can enforce the license. If there are multiple authors of a copyrighted work, successful enforcement depends on having the cooperation of all authors.

        So it seems like the FSF does this in order to be able to enforce GPL. Buuut, these guys really gotta be the exception. I feel like the probability of the FSF selling out and going full corporate evil is pretty low…

        a good idea to have a CLA so that’s no conflict that the project owns the code.

        That’s exactly the problem though. The project owning the code, instead of the contributors owning the code.

      • paequ2@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I don’t think the type of license matters too much if you have to sign a CLA, since the company can just change it whenever they want. For example, you can be AGPL today (Joplin) and then not AGPL tomorrow.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      How would you determine if a thing is true open source, or capitalism masquerading as open source like you’ve described, if you were to just stumble onto a software randomly and wanted to check?

    • derek@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Near as I understand it: years ago some dumb engineering decisions were made, acknowledged, and corrected. Is there some recent scandal I’m out of the loop on?

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never heard of 99% in that list.

    Also, Gitea should not be there. It is a corporate -owned open core project that was hostilely taken away from the community.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I wish more software wasn’t “hosted” these days.

    I miss app ass apps.

    Don’t mind me. I’m just feeling old.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean this lemmy is for self hosting apps. Not sure what you were expecting to come across lol. If you don’t have a Nas or server or dedicated host computer you’re probably not gonna enjoy anything in this lemmy

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hosted apps means you can use them on multiple devices. Otherwise, I have to wait until I get home, power up my laptop, wait for the OS to boot, wait for the app to load, then do the thing I wanted to do.

      Any thoughts on how to solve the data sync problem without hosting? I guess I remember some apps doing a local network sync to get data to multiple devices. I kinda remember having problems with that not working all the time…

  • nottelling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In addition to other suggestions, the cards need to show what they’re alternative to without clicking.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah I havent been able to load the cf verification on my android for like over a week now lol